About the Ipod touch as a gaming console, I think they made that statement backed by the fact that Ipod touch has sold more than DS and PSP together this year (or last year? don't remember, I read it somewhere), but I wouldn't really think people buy it for the gaming factor, if Iphone didn't exist I would buy it for it's Ipod features, and that's why I bought the Iphone in the first place, I had no idea what it had when I bought my 3g in 2008, I just wanted a phone that had an Ipod
Yes, they completely neglect motivation when they claim it's the "nr. 1 portable gaming device". It's the typical marketing mumbojumbo: You take a favouring statistic and spin your facts and claims accordingly.
It's like saying that the BlackBerry OS is the most popular gaming platform on mobile phones... completely deprived of
context.
I'm with Marcus on the whole issue of portable gaming: The touch and tilt controls work great for many casual games that are tailored towards these peripherals, but the missing tactile feedback and the simple fact that your fingers always get in your sight heavily deprive the experience for more comprehensive games.
Rumor has it that Sony's developing an PSP-like Android 3.0 based phone, merging the best of both worlds so to say. An interesting approach IMO.
-----
Concerning the whole Jobs discussion: I don't like him, you don't like him... probably his own cat hates him. BUT: I also have lots of respect for his salesman qualities. Because that's what he is, a gifted salesman. People say he's got a great sense for coming trends, well I rather think he's gifted at creating trends because he always follows his agenda with iron perfectionism.
Remember when the original iPod came out? That thing got mixed reviews at best, tech journalists were d'accord that this thing surely
looks nice but is overall not worth shelling out $400 for most people.
And we all know how that went... Everyone wanted an iPod even though comparable media players did exist for way less money. Jobs never ever created something tangible in his life, he pairs his vision with the developments of assorted talented people (starting with Wozniak) and he creates (the illusion of)
added value to these products. Jobs doesn't sell media players, phones and computers. He sells
lifestyle objects. And that's why Joe Shmoe, who isn't a prosaic tech journalist, went crazy about the iPod: Jobs successfully created that illusion that you're not only buying a profane media player, but rather a trend object that will actively and instantly raise your life's quality. Don't
miss out...
That message is so persistent and pervasive that it doesn't simply amplify sales numbers, it also created an extreme loyalty of the customer base towards that company. And I'm not necessarily saying that people are being
fooled nor that the products are lacklustre at the core, after all, people are very content with their products - and that's what matters for them. The price/value relation is very subjective after all.
Jobs IS an asshole. This is the guy who fobbed his partner, Wozniak, off with $350 for the creation of "Breakout", even though Jobs received $5000 from Atari for the game and Wozniak did ALL the programming.
But it's also the guy who enabled Woz to become a stupidly rich mofo. The characteristics that make for a good businessman aren't exactly the ones that'll make for a very
likeable person. I'm pretty sure, Apple shareholders couldn't care less...