~Neurotica
perfectly insane
- Mar 27, 2006
- 7,913
- 236
- 63
Regina Spektor looks pretty cute in the picture in your signature, but Joanna Newsome is a fucking beast. Absolutely repugnant. I take her face as an insult to my eyes. And her hair is unquestionably atrocious, and frankly, see probably frightens little kids.
HEY NETTY BABE PADDY ONLY TELLING IT HOW IT IS^ I think, missus would appreciate the second part of sentence.
![]()
Art for a special business card-style CD in a 3" case (details tentative) from my new project...
XANAFALGUE (Lunar Autopsy is the title FYI; the style is power electronics/death industrial)
that girl is hot, the greys.
morts sig girl is not, at all
That's some cool shit dude![]()
nahThose pictures are better than the one in your signature...that picture makes me want to flog her to death.
This is what I want!
![]()
she is hot too.. but most girls are hotter than the chick in your sig.As I said, being desensitized by images of unrealistic girls such as
http://www.googlegirls.za.net/wp-content/babes/very_sexy_babe.jpg
will make you unable to recognize that a perfect skinny body, big breasts, and ass are not the only thing that makes girls attractive.
EDIT: The girl that The Greys posted is alright looking, not amazingly fake looking like soe of the people I've seen him post.
EDIT 2: She kinda looks like Evangeline Lilly from Lost.
she is hot too.. but most girls are hotter than the chick in your sig.
this chick is hot BRUV![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hot, cute, pretty, whatever. she is none of those.