I would.
Since we are adding demographics...(not sure if this belongs to this area of the forum but nevermind) I am studying Philosophy and Psychology so this can be quite an interesting thread (for me)...
I actually agree with Vuashke and would also add that it is a bit arrogant to rule out the existence of god since well, we don't know enough. There are good arguments for evolutionary theory (excellent arguments) but evolutionary theory does not explain the fine-tuning of the universe that is apt for life, etc..I won't go into details because I don't want to make a thesis out of this, besides there are arguments against all the design arguments as well. The major problem that the creationist faces is to explain what god created god if god appeared out of nothing, and why did he/she/it decided to emerge...but again, there's always an argument any creationist has up their sleeve: it is arrogant to think we can come up with an answer when we are simple creatures and don't know enough about the nature of time, space and the universe or even ourselves.
I think it is more plausible to deny the existence of a holy god altogether rather than deny the existence of a creator, since the problem of evil is very damaging to religion (western). Dostoyevsky:
"Imagine that you are creating a fabric of human destiny with the object of making men happy in the end, giving them peace and rest at last, but that it was essential and inevitable to torture to death only one tiny creature - that baby beating its breast with its fist, for instance - and to found that edifice on its unavenged tears, would you consent to be the architect on those conditions? Tell me, and tell the truth?"
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Brothers Karamazov