Hubster
...
Satyricon for me is a godawful band. Even their earlier material (which for only one reason I will commend in that they were so young when they did it) is boring. I just don't consider them important at all.
The truth is I do like Burzum, but lesser than Darkthrone, Satyricon, and Emperor. I think Satyricon is really underrated and an essential piece of Norwegian 2nd wave BMThen you don't know anything about Black Metal, do you?
I thought Dark Medieval Times was pretty damn good.
The only sub genre defined by ideology is NSBM. Oddly enough, I've heard several NSBM bands whose riffing style is much more like death metal or even thrash than black metal (Antimsemitix, Grom, etc.).No, ideology doesn't make the subgenre, the music does.
Satyricon for me is a godawful band. Even their earlier material (which for only one reason I will commend in that they were so young when they did it) is boring. I just don't consider them important at all.
He wants to close it I would assume because we can only discuss the bands he likes and no one else's..
anyways I'm not a elitist by any definition of the word but I just don't like their Black n Roll style at all now that I heard their earlier style... If Satyr did those recordings at age 17 then he was one talented SOB & was really underrated.. and to bring Frost in with him also... but I definetly will be getting Nemesis because people keep recommending it and saying it's the best one out of the first three...
i like satyricon, but really only dark medieval times and Nemesis Devina. But since enslaved is mentioned here, i personally think they are a great band
Yggdrasil was a split with Satyricon, so they both came out around the same time though DMT predated Enslaved's first album.
Besides, DMT has an accoustic guitar and a flute and much more of a feel for the period it was themed on rather then just viking metal.