monoxide_child
New Metal Member
- Jul 30, 2008
- 6,210
- 4
- 0
do you guys think that this new Amazing Spiderman film will be better or worse than the first one?
do you guys think that this new Amazing Spiderman film will be better or worse than the first one?
I will eat my hat if they finally do get around to the Aliens/Predator thing.
I was let down by the Dolph Lundgren Punisher vehicle, back in '89....but it is now one of my faves on dvd. it is ULTRA violent compared to the watered down matrix-esque crap out there today. Personally I liked SPIDER-MAN, as a Sam Raimi picture. However, his best work was The Gift w/ Darkman a close second....
On a better note, hella many films are FINALLY in production that will rule ass. Listen to this....
BAT-MAN vs SUPERMAN no contest
ALIENS vs PREDATOR sucked
FREDDY vs JASON great!
HULK sucked
DAREDEVIL fucking sucked
X MEN 2 ok
SPY HUNTER
and my fave GHOST RIDER almost as bad as daredevil
All of these movies are out of limbo and finally in pre or post production, and I couldn't be more happy.
Lastly, on the plot: "In this new version, there are no supervillains, archenemies or any of that. It's just a spook movie, something scary going bump in the night.""[/COLOR][/SIZE]
Punisher Warzone was very good, much better than the first one
I'll see it. I'm a massive Spidey freak, but it's too soon for a re-boot. I hope this time around the get Venom right at least. (Venom and Carnage....best super villans EVER)
The idea of a new Spawn production has me totally stoked though.
"Website My DVD Insider caught up with comic artists legend Todd McFarlane, who was very open when talking about his plans for an R-rated Spawn reboot. After jokingly acknowledging that "Spawn" fans of the '90s are now old enough to see an R-rated film, he updated the status of the screenplay:
"I'm three quarters through it," he explains. "I'll finish it and put it on a shelf for about a week. What usually happens is, I come back to it so I can see all the flaws. I do a rewrite and there's a first draft at that point."
Speaking on studio interest, McFarlane is iron first on his demands: he will only make it if he can write, produce, direct (probably so Spawn doesn't end up with a nose, again).
"[A few studios have phoned me to talk about the project] and when I walk into these pitch meetings, I go here's the story. I give them the broad strokes. Then I go, here's the non-negotiable part: I write, produce, direct. That's it," he states adding that it WILL be low budget, therefore he might as well be the "schmuck" who directs it.
Lastly, on the plot: "In this new version, there are no supervillains, archenemies or any of that. It's just a spook movie, something scary going bump in the night.""
the rights to the Frank Castle/Punisher character have already reverted back to Disney, meaning that there's now going to be a brand new Punisher movie that will take place in the same "movie universe" as IronMan, IronMan 2, Thor, Captain America, and the Avengers movie
Well that sucks. I mean I hope the new film will be good, but The Punisher by Disney?
also
if anyone cares
there's gonna be a Preacher movie
woo-hoo
Disney won't control the content of the movie, they'll just be in charge of "distributing" it, Marvel will still control the content, same as they did for IronMan, Thor, Hulk Re-boot, Captain America, Punisher movie won't look like a "Disney movie"
the only thing Disney might do is insist that their Punisher movie be rated PG-13 instead of R, a PG-13 Punisher movie could still be decent, maybe
I see. Didn't know that all those movies were under Disney's umberella. I'm fine with PG-13 but The Punisher needs to be fucking violent and merciless!!
no one cares about a preacher movie???
I heard that it will be more of a "Frank Castle" movie rather then a "Punisher" movie