I've been annoyed about this for a good while now, but the issue has really reared its ugly head in the 'Rate Slayer albums' thread. (Namely, Hell Awaits being ranked 1/2 by a large number of you. Not that I particularly have a problem with this rating, but rather the way it has come about)
Before I go on, firstly, I understand that there are some more guided opinions floating about the forums when compared to some of the non-sense posted. I also have no problem with people having different opinions to me. I'm pretty used to it.
However, I think as far as the way people converse on this board and subsequently what sort of music they are listening to, individuality has been tainted by elitism, iconism and all sorts of other 'isms' (hehe).
Anyhow, where you can see these issues are in the countless (and fucking repititive) 'recommend me some epic black metal' threads (and the like), the tail-gating of the opinions of certain forums members and the now seemingly uniform opinions a significant number of you seem to have.
When I first joined this board I was baffled with all the Sabbath bashing that was then rampant here. Similarly I remember seeing threads polling who was greater out of Testament and Slayer, Testament winning hands down. Black metal was barely discussed and the top 100 albums of all time would have been dominated by Maiden, Priest, Slayer, Testament with scattered 'underground' bands throughout.
Now, I cant load this front page without seeing something about how much better black metal is than any other form of metal. Similarly, I can't go into a thread about a melodic death band without having some athiest, judeo-christian hating whore whinning about the evils of the gothenburg sound.
Don't take this thread as a targeting anything in particular about a single view (although I will agree my argument is one sided). The aim rather is just discuss how much opinions have been lead in this board. From my perspective they have been lead astray, towards the 'unpopular' paradoxically being the popular. Not because it is 'not popular' opinion, but simply because it is becoming popular opinion because it is cult or unusual.
This makes for an unhealthy board. If people can't form opinions themselves, without having to first research the views of anus.com, other members and any other unusual sources other than music itself, then their opinions are next to worthless.
Any thoughts?
Before I go on, firstly, I understand that there are some more guided opinions floating about the forums when compared to some of the non-sense posted. I also have no problem with people having different opinions to me. I'm pretty used to it.
However, I think as far as the way people converse on this board and subsequently what sort of music they are listening to, individuality has been tainted by elitism, iconism and all sorts of other 'isms' (hehe).
Anyhow, where you can see these issues are in the countless (and fucking repititive) 'recommend me some epic black metal' threads (and the like), the tail-gating of the opinions of certain forums members and the now seemingly uniform opinions a significant number of you seem to have.
When I first joined this board I was baffled with all the Sabbath bashing that was then rampant here. Similarly I remember seeing threads polling who was greater out of Testament and Slayer, Testament winning hands down. Black metal was barely discussed and the top 100 albums of all time would have been dominated by Maiden, Priest, Slayer, Testament with scattered 'underground' bands throughout.
Now, I cant load this front page without seeing something about how much better black metal is than any other form of metal. Similarly, I can't go into a thread about a melodic death band without having some athiest, judeo-christian hating whore whinning about the evils of the gothenburg sound.
Don't take this thread as a targeting anything in particular about a single view (although I will agree my argument is one sided). The aim rather is just discuss how much opinions have been lead in this board. From my perspective they have been lead astray, towards the 'unpopular' paradoxically being the popular. Not because it is 'not popular' opinion, but simply because it is becoming popular opinion because it is cult or unusual.
This makes for an unhealthy board. If people can't form opinions themselves, without having to first research the views of anus.com, other members and any other unusual sources other than music itself, then their opinions are next to worthless.
Any thoughts?