the Movies thread

Blitzkrieg said:
I shall rephrase. Why would finding some of the information presented in the film interesting make you an ignorant shiteater?

Never said anything about interest either.


I said eyeopening.


If you think that Supersize Me was eyeopening, then you are an ignorant shiteater.

Is that clear enough for you blitzy? Would you like if I typed that in larger print for the sight impaired?

If you think that Supersize Me was eyeopening, then you are an ignorant shiteater.
 
I think that you are ignorant for thinking that.

Eyeopening doesn't have to mean eyeopening to the fact that McDonalds is bad for you, it can mean eyeopening to specifics about how it is bad for you. I agree that you shouldn't need the film to tell you it is bad for you, but I also think it would be fair to say that not many people would know the specifics about it, and that having seen the film, they would have more knowledge on the subject, hence the film being eyeopening.
 
Blitzkrieg said:
I think that you are ignorant for thinking that.

Eyeopening doesn't have to mean eyeopening to the fact that McDonalds is bad for you, it can mean eyeopening to specifics about how it is bad for you. I agree that you shouldn't need the film to tell you it is bad for you, but I also think it would be fair to say that not many people would know the specifics about it, and that having seen the film, they would have more knowledge on the subject, hence the film being eyeopening.

If you know something is bad for you in the first place, you shouldn't have to know the specifics about why it is bad for you.

I heard drinking metho is bad for me, but I'm not going to go and find out the specifics of it am i? fuck no, I just won't do it.


If people are honestly that stupid that they need a film like this, I'm glad they are all obese fat cunts who will die of heart disease.
 
I never said you should know the specifics, but that doesn't make it any less interesting to some people. Who needs to know half the shit they show on the discovery channel, for example? Alot of it is just useless information, but some people (including myself) still find some things like that interesting.
 
Blitzkrieg said:
$16? Fuck Sydney indeed.

They put those anti-piracey adds on before films at the cinema now, but charge you that much to go see a film, it isn't exactly encouraging to do the right thing.
Hell yeah that sucks
took my nephew to see Shrek 2 today....for Brian,myself and my nephew it cost $39. We decided to go to a small cinema close to home which would have cost only $18...but once I got to the box office they had sold out tickets.So we went to Hoyts in Penrith.
Then I found out it snowed 20 mins away today he my nephew now wishes we had gone to see snow not a movie......that would have cost zilch.