I just wanted to point out the editorial column that I just wrote about Opeth since I think that some people around here might be intersted (duh!).
http://www.MusiqueMachine.com
here is an excerpt:
I think that the problem with Opeth is that they are too good at what they do for their own good, but before disagreeing, let me explain the context.
I remember a few years ago, Opeth had very few fans, but those were mostly into this brand new thing that didn't really have a name. Some called it dark metal, whatever. The important thing is to know that this subgenre of metal is formed of many hybrid bands that mostly sound nothing like each other but shared one characteristics: originality.
So as I was saying, Opeth was unknown to most, but the fans they had loved it! And they were so good at what they were doing that many of these fans became obsessed by the band; it became they favourite band, they raved about it on music forums, wrote praising reviews about this 'glorious & perfect' band that had changed their life, etc.
the rest at http://www.MusiqueMachine.com
http://www.MusiqueMachine.com
here is an excerpt:
I think that the problem with Opeth is that they are too good at what they do for their own good, but before disagreeing, let me explain the context.
I remember a few years ago, Opeth had very few fans, but those were mostly into this brand new thing that didn't really have a name. Some called it dark metal, whatever. The important thing is to know that this subgenre of metal is formed of many hybrid bands that mostly sound nothing like each other but shared one characteristics: originality.
So as I was saying, Opeth was unknown to most, but the fans they had loved it! And they were so good at what they were doing that many of these fans became obsessed by the band; it became they favourite band, they raved about it on music forums, wrote praising reviews about this 'glorious & perfect' band that had changed their life, etc.
the rest at http://www.MusiqueMachine.com