I think age also comes into play with these types of things. When you mentioned betrayal, it really made me think back to those times. When you're young and stupid (at least some of us), you have this feeling of entitlement -- 'this band is mine, it's for me and me only! -- and then you get older and you realize that it's the music BUSINESS. When I was 13, 14 years old listening to In Flames, I didn't really think about the fact that people were making this music and wanted to make a living from it. They didn't want to spend time in the studio and tour and also work a day job so they could pay their rent, eat, provide for their families. That just never registered to me as a kid. Obviously I understood the idea of having a job and paying your bills, but it seemed way more important that these bands maintained a specific style to suit my tastes. It's a truly selfish, stupid way of looking at things. But alas, that could be part of growing up and being naive.
But in maintaining that mindset, you do feel a sense of betrayal when these bands you love who create music you love no longer tailor their sound to a style you enjoy. At this point in my life, I understand it. I just don't listen to music that I don't enjoy. It's pretty simple. Would I have loved if In Flames continued their progression differently? Sure. But it isn't some devastating blow like it was to me as a teenager. And it did feel devastating and disappointing then. I still hold their early work in high regard, I just don't really look forward to new material, especially because when I look at In Flames, I don't see/hear In Flames anymore. Although I love The Jester Race/Whoracle days, I will always think of the Colony-ASOP era as In Flames (even if I didn't particularly enjoy some of that work). In Flames will always be Jesper, Anders, Bjorn, Peter and Daniel to me. Right now, as talented as they may be, I think of the current line up as Anders & Bjorn & Company. They just feel like stand-ins. I truly hope that when the day comes that In Flames calls it quits, that we get to see those five guys together at least one more time.
I think you're spot on here. As you get older your perception changes, your idealism becomes cynicism and rather than becoming outraged or angry you just become bitter over what you see and hear. When STYE came out I was pissed off. When Battles came out I was just annoyed and rolling my eyes at its stupidity - but I'm also now analysing things, as you say, from a business perspective. It's not that 'this music isn't tr00 IF, arrghhh', it's more like, 'who exactly do they expect to sell this music to? Nobody is going to like this'. Even so, I wasn't about to go to IF social media and rage at them about it. I was fine to just rip on it in this tiny corner of the internet and leave others to be outraged on my behalf if they felt so entitled to do so.
Pretty much agree with you regarding IF perception. To me the 'real' In Flames was 1996 - 2008, irrespective of how the output sounded. That was the core group of guys who made the band what it was, and what I had loved. After that IF slowly became less and less themselves, and nowadays I'd just refer to it as 'Howard Benson's In Flames' as to me that's all it is. Howard Benson's version of the sound, totally devoid of any authenticity. Fake as can be. Still shits out some decent music sometimes, because Anders and Bjorn do have that ability, but not remotely similar to the OG In Flames.