Worst Guitar solo ever heard?
- Thread starter Goober
- Start date
Powers
Good Morning USA!
Kenneth R.
Cináed
Powers
Good Morning USA!
Kenneth R. said:that song is a classic. i agree though
You can tell the guitarist wanted to write a really massive 80's porno cheesey solo but just wasn't allowed.
Tubbs
Bi-weekly top album:
Led Opeth
Member
nirvana solos suck bad in general...kurt cobain sucks as a guitarist..i dont care what anyone says...and none of that #1 Band Ever bull shit either...and theres no way in hell he should be within the top 100 guitarists
Led Opeth
Member
Kenneth R.
Cináed
+50.Led Opeth said:
There is simply no way anyone can justify any of it. He was very influential, but that doesn't change the fact that he sucked.
Fredy_Brown
The Line Begins To blur.
Jude
Hot nuns 4 lyfe
- Sep 8, 2005
- 522
- 0
- 16
- 37
ActuallyTubbs Mcgee said:
Yes it does.
You are wrong.
The only way you can defend that statement is by saying that ridiculously technical, fast, but unlistenable guitar playing is better than a simple but good song.
And edit: Yeah Cobain was nothing special as a guitarist but he was a fine songwriter, if not the most creative. Don't hate on him excessively just because it's the cool thing to do.
Tubbs
Bi-weekly top album:
Thanks for lettimg me be entitled to my opinion.Jude said:
Apparantly you think you are always right, therefore that makes you an elitist.
Nirvana is a poor band with poor solos, and I would take wanking over that simple garbage anyday.
Kenneth R.
Cináed
i agree in general, but i still think he was a below average guitarist, and average songwriter at best. and people on this board should know by now i'm hardly ever in step with what the cool thing to do is
simple but good > fast but shite
wank is equally boring as a 3 powerchord album. neither one has sonic depth or range of expressive emotion.
simple but good > fast but shite
wank is equally boring as a 3 powerchord album. neither one has sonic depth or range of expressive emotion.
Tubbs
Bi-weekly top album:
I'm disagreeing with you again.Kenneth R. said:i agree in general, but i still think he was a below average guitarist, and average songwriter at best. and people on this board should know by now i'm hardly ever in step with what the cool thing to do is
simple but good > fast but shite
wank is equally boring as a 3 powerchord album. neither one has sonic depth or range of expressive emotion.
I say simple but good = fast but shite.
I don't listen to fast "Shite" though, I listen to good "Shite".
Simple stuff is too boring for my big brain.
(Insert IQ joke here if you want to.)
Fredy_Brown
The Line Begins To blur.
Kenneth R.
Cináed
Jude
Hot nuns 4 lyfe
- Sep 8, 2005
- 522
- 0
- 16
- 37
Wank and poor solos are equally bad, but I wouldn't call Nirvana's solos unlistenable, whereas when people say wank they usually mean technical to the point of being unlistenable...Tubbs Mcgee said:Thanks for lettimg me be entitled to my opinion.
Apparantly you think you are always right, therefore that makes you an elitist.
Nirvana is a poor band with poor solos, and I would take wanking over that simple garbage anyday.
Both are fairly boring but I would rather listen to Nirvana any day.
Tubbs
Bi-weekly top album:
Okay, that's better.
But I personally think Nirvana is worthless and I'd rather listen to an insane, fast, and undecipherable solo any day.
But I personally think Nirvana is worthless and I'd rather listen to an insane, fast, and undecipherable solo any day.
Kenneth R.
Cináed
insane, fast, undecipherable tremolo picked solo coming up. give me 2 minutes and 12th fret on E. you will worship my madd skillz.
