soundave said:
@Tubbs: At the time that Smells Like Teen Spirit came out, it blew me away. Radio music sucked then, and the world (music and otherwise) was a very different place. No fucking internet to help you discover and talk about new music. If you lived in the wrong place, you might never hear about some bands. So the radio was often your #1 way of hearing music, especially when driving around in your car (when I was a teenager, it was the only place I felt really free). So, when SLTS came out, I was amazed. I wanted to hear it again right after it was over. It sounded like nothing else on the radio. It spoke to me in a way that other music at the time did not. I loved it for its simplicity, its tone, its aggression, its depression. I felt like everything sucked at that point in my life, and Kurt was singing about it. And I AM a guitarist, incidentally...
Anyhow, to the point: there's a long history of solos simply being instrumental takes on the melody (sometimes with embellishments, sometimes not). Can you imagine a shred solo over SLTS? Talk about worst solo ever! It would miss the point. I can understand if you don't like the music; you're not from that time or that mindset. I get it. I can understand ANYONE not liking Nirvana, actually. I appreciate Nevermind (only have it on tape) and have In Utero (hardly listen to it) and the unplugged thingy (xmas present from years ago...nearly unlistenable), so I'm no fan. Just saying that SLTS solo is not really all that "bad". Maybe a bit bland, but not bad. How do you feel about Neil Young? I imagine you dislike his stuff, too?
Ah, soundave. You're a person I can really respect around here. (Along with Kenneth R.)
Anyway, since you're opinion was backed up by plenty of reason, I can respect it. The truth is, I don't really hate Nirvana, I hate the people around here who bash eachother all the time. (Myself included.)
That is why I get mad (Which is a dumb thing to do on the internet anyway.) at people because they don't support their reasons and just say things to get people pissed, or to try and prove that they are always right.
I still think the solo sucks, but you should be able to respect that, right?
And I think Symphony X is 1000X better than Nirvana in every aspect. Singing, guitar playing, melody, SOLOS. You can respect that, right?
Wouldn't it be great if everyone did then?
Anyway, the point of this thread is to point out crappy solos, not to compare 2 bands that aren't even on the same wavelength together. (And by that I mean genre.)
Anyway, I got more:
Any solos off of Octavarium
Any solos off of Falling Into Infinity (Except Hell's Kitchen)
There. See? I named two ENTIRE Dream Theater albums. And the difference here is, instead of calling them crap without backing it up, I have a reason because I've ACTUALLY HEARD THE ALBUMS BEFORE.
The songs off of Octavarium sound extremely mainstream to me, and mainstream solos never sound good (IN MY OPINION) because they usually are short on go over crappy background music. Nonetheless, I still like this album.
As for Falling Into Infinity, most of the songs are just so sappy and cheesy that the solos don't belong in the first place. (IN MY OPINION)
So, anyone want to bash me or come up with a valid opinion with backup?
As for Neil Young, I really enjoy his stuff.