Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
Technically, that is progression as it is making advancements and movements forward. If you choose to see them as something else I can not help you.
				
			Technically, that is progression as it is making advancements and movements forward. If you choose to see them as something else I can not help you.
I understand what you are saying, but there are cases and examples where I do not believe it is true.
CV, have you heard Sear Bliss? I would like to know if you believe that is progression.
I'm sorry that you don't understand what I'm saying, Dave, but I don't care enough to explain it to you. Others understand what I'm saying.
Anyways, to progress in black metal, what you should do is not to add random, unrelated elements to the current framework, but rather, expand upon it, like it was done in the examples I gave above.
Technically, that is progression as it is making advancements and movements forward. If you choose to see them as something else I can not help you.
It's easy, just ask a few questions: Why? What does this add to the music? What's the point? If you can't muster up anything other than it sounds cool, it's unique, it's different, then you probably have a gimmick.Who is to decide that adding shoegaze elements into black metal is a gimmick?
Kind of exactly my point, yeah.
I understand what you're saying, but I think the issue is who the fuck decides if a band is just tacking something on without the purpose of truly wanting to do something new with music. Who is to decide that adding shoegaze elements into black metal is a gimmick? I mean people have been mixing genres for years and yet you don't see people calling rock a gimmick for mixing blues and country. I just think that it is unfair to assume that just because a band does something "weird" they're doing it for nothing more than to do something weird, and that what they're doing is a regression of black metal or in some way a bastardization.
I get what you're saying, I just don't agree.
Anyone making a post-black thread will be shot on sight.
It's easy, just ask a few questions: Why? What does this add to the music? What's the point? If you can't muster up anything other than it sounds cool, it's unique, it's different, then you probably have a gimmick.
I think you're confusing speakers. I never accused anyone of being a gimmick.
The point that you do bring up, of course, is a very interesting one. Who really is to decide what is genuinely a cohesive incorporation of foreign elements and what is just a mishmash, copy/paste job? The only real answer is that it's almost entirely subjective to the listener, which makes the matter that much harder. I never assumed that a band doing something different (or "weird") must be doing it merely for the sake of being different. I do think that there are bands who do this, but I certainly have no stigma against bands doing something different. And when I used the term bastardization, I didn't mean it in a pejorative fashion.