Erik
New Metal Member
Mayhem is one thing, but Burzum I can understand, because Varg is/was basically a nazi.JayKeeley said:(1) Some white people were laughing at black people wearing Mayhem and Burzum shirts to metal shows.
Mayhem is one thing, but Burzum I can understand, because Varg is/was basically a nazi.JayKeeley said:(1) Some white people were laughing at black people wearing Mayhem and Burzum shirts to metal shows.
Aha but you didn't pick up on the way I used the word 'colored' to describe non-white people. Do white people qualify as having 'color' by the way? I'm just curious because my white wife spends muchos dolleros down the tanning salon.Erik said:Yes. Saying ethnic minority makes much more sense, and such usage adheres to the common definition of the word. What all my whining about usage of the word "ethnic" basically boils down to for me is that I'm very sensitive to rape of languages.
Well, I'm not sure if he was before entering prison? Also, I can understand the hysteria of a non-white person wearing some sort of nazi memorabilia, but I have no issue with them wearing NSBM shirts.Erik said:Mayhem is one thing, but Burzum I can understand, because Varg is/was basically a nazi.
I agree. THat's like some of these black guys in Texas that listen to David Allen Coe and other semi-racist country artists, and proudly brandish Confederate Flags (which in and of itself isn't a racist symbol, but is perceived as one by the less informed)Erik said:Mayhem is one thing, but Burzum I can understand, because Varg is/was basically a nazi.
Me? I don't own a Graveland shirt, but I do own some of their music.Erik said:Then again you have a Graveland shirt and I'm not laughing at you... Though I can understand why people would find such things strange.
I don't think "colored" (or "coloured" as they've taught me to spell it ) is a good term either as yes, white people have some sort of colour too, but at least it's not misused in the same way as "ethnic." As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing wrong with "white", "black", "non-white", "non-black" etc, and those are the words I use.JayKeeley said:Aha but you didn't pick up on the way I used the word 'colored' to describe non-white people. Do white people qualify as having 'color' by the way? I'm just curious because my white wife spends muchos dolleros down the tanning salon.
Oh shit. You didn't even go to Wacken, ha ha. I just recalled how someone wore a Graveland shirt (Mark, wasn't it?) on the Wacken photos that were posted here and somehow my mind told me that was you. Oh well.JayKeeley said:Me? I don't own a Graveland shirt, but I do own some of their music.
Thing is, this can get even more granular. You see, I always felt odd even using the term "black". Obviously this is a white man's term in the way that "negroes" would be referred to throughout history. But somehow, "negro" is even more politically incorrect than "black". Some 'black' people also refuse to be called "African American" because there is nothing "African" about them.Erik said:As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing wrong with "white", "black", "non-white", "non-black" etc, and those are the words I use.
Interesting comment. Is the English language actually being raped, or is it merely evolving as time marches on?Erik said:I'm very sensitive to rape of languages.
I think this is an American thing. It's pretty accepted to say "svart" = "black" here, although gradually more and more PC people decide that "mörkhyad" = "dark-skinned" is a better word. The way I see it, as long as it's OK to say "white," it's OK to say "black." Neither is really descriptive, but better than the alternatives to these ears.JayKeeley said:Thing is, this can get even more granular. You see, I always felt odd even using the term "black". Obviously this is a white man's term in the way that "negroes" would be referred to throughout history. But somehow, "negro" is even more politically incorrect than "black".
Sure, I can understand that. They're quite simply American citizens who are also black. I mean, you're pretty much immigrants the lot of you, but you don't see most white Americans going around claiming to be "Swedish Americans" or "German Americans" or what have you.JayKeeley said:Some 'black' people also refuse to be called "African American" because there is nothing "African" about them.
er...hehe, yeah...um, we were just kidding about that. Must have forgotten to tell you!ChiefB said:If anything 'rapes the fabric' of the English language, it has to be Ebonics. I only found out this year that Ebonics is actually a proper language, officially recognised within the USA.
Sorry - don't get me wrong. It's ok to say "black" here too, it was just me feeling awkward about referring to a 'black' guy as "black". But hey black people refer to themselves as "black" so I'll lose the inverted commas from now on.Erik said:I think this is an American thing. It's pretty accepted to say "svart" = "black" here, although gradually more and more PC people decide that "mörkhyad" = "dark-skinned" is a better word. The way I see it, as long as it's OK to say "white," it's OK to say "black." Neither is really descriptive, but better than the alternatives to these ears.
er, yes you fucking do, and it annoys the hell out of me. My wife is from an "Irish-American" town where 99.99% of people who live there have (a) are 10th generation American, (b) have never been to Ireland, and (c) don't know anything about Ireland or its people.I mean, you're pretty much immigrants the lot of you, but you don't see most white Americans going around claiming to be "Swedish Americans" or "German Americans" or what have you.
I don't know... Making distinctions like these are always hard, but generally I think that whatever www.dictionary.com tells me is the proper definition of a word IS the proper definition of the word.ChiefB said:Interesting comment. Is the English language actually being raped, or is it merely evolving as time marches on?
Höh. Well, that's pretty stupid. I mean, taking pride in your heritage is a good thing, but then at least they could learn a little bit about it...JayKeeley said:er, yes you fucking do, and it annoys the hell out of me. My wife is from an "Irish-American" town where 99.99% of people who live there have (a) are 10th generation American, (b) have never been to Ireland, and (c) don't know anything about Ireland or its people.
They all call themselves Irish-Americans.
They just call themselves Irish because they don't want to be lumped in with the Puerto Ricans (just so the segregation can continue), and they have the occasional pint of Guinness.
JayKeeley said:Well, I'm not sure if he was before entering prison?
Well, that would require the average American to learn something about another country. Höh.Erik said:Höh. Well, that's pretty stupid. I mean, taking pride in your heritage is a good thing, but then at least they could learn a little bit about it...