Charlie giving Bush the Finger?

Scott also said that the reason why the did the reunion back in '05 was because they couldn't survive doing another album with the Bush line up. They had to do the reunion in order to survive as a band. I think a lot of people were pissed that they weren't going to go forward and make an album with Joey at the time (for whatever reason any of them want to use) and interest, again, declined. John filled contractual obligations for the band and then they got Dan Nelson. In hindsight, they would've been better off getting Matthew or Gunnar Nelson because at least those guys know how to tour. Fans had a morbid curiosity as to how that might turn out (it was worse than Gary Cherone's stint in VH), Dan quit/got fired and business picked up when Joey got back.

I think Scott and Charlie may prefer to have Bush in the band but, unless Scott wants to live in Meat Loaf's basement for the rest of his life, he knows having Joey in the band is the best thing for business.

Whatever the case may be, I'm just happy it turned out the way it did and where they are at this point :devil: Nothin' against Bush.
 
Regarding the more popular era of Anthrax, it's obviously Joey's first stint in the group. But when the new Armored Saint was released last year, I either read or heard an interview with John Bush where the interviewer asked him about Anthrax selling less records and tickets after he joined. His response was that it was probably hard for the rest of the guys, but for him it was like "All right, we're going to be able to eat tonight. This is great."

Maybe it doesn't fit here so much, but it seemed funny to me. Also, success kind of depends on your perception.
 
Regarding the more popular era of Anthrax, it's obviously Joey's first stint in the group. But when the new Armored Saint was released last year, I either read or heard an interview with John Bush where the interviewer asked him about Anthrax selling less records and tickets after he joined. His response was that it was probably hard for the rest of the guys, but for him it was like "All right, we're going to be able to eat tonight. This is great."

Maybe it doesn't fit here so much, but it seemed funny to me. Also, success kind of depends on your perception.

That's right. :Spin:
 
Mustaine is the #1 offender for this stuff. Promoting the current lineup by portraying the old one in a bad way.

Instead of saying more people are coming to see Joey than John, Charlie could have said "the response has been great, and lots of people are coming to the shows". And I'm not really a fan of Busthrax. I thought SOWN was good, but I lost interest after that. If Bush is ever back in the band, this comment will come back to haunt him like Scott's Bird/Lion comment.

What all that shit does is damage the credibility of the band. I bought the reunion DVD with Joey and Spitz, and that had video showing them all hugging and talking about how great it is to be back together, water under the bridge, yadda yadda yadda. Then when the reunion fell through, they were all talking about they didn't really come together for the right reasons.

So right now, this lineup is the best, everything is great, blah blah blah. Wait until Joey's next depature, then we'll hear what a disaster all this was from day one.

I hope this lasts a long time, with more albums coming from it. However history tells me that this could implode at any time.
 
Mustaine is the #1 offender for this stuff. Promoting the current lineup by portraying the old one in a bad way.

Instead of saying more people are coming to see Joey than John, Charlie could have said "the response has been great, and lots of people are coming to the shows". And I'm not really a fan of Busthrax. I thought SOWN was good, but I lost interest after that. If Bush is ever back in the band, this comment will come back to haunt him like Scott's Bird/Lion comment.

What all that shit does is damage the credibility of the band. I bought the reunion DVD with Joey and Spitz, and that had video showing them all hugging and talking about how great it is to be back together, water under the bridge, yadda yadda yadda. Then when the reunion fell through, they were all talking about they didn't really come together for the right reasons.

So right now, this lineup is the best, everything is great, blah blah blah. Wait until Joey's next depature, then we'll hear what a disaster all this was from day one.

I hope this lasts a long time, with more albums coming from it. However history tells me that this could implode at any time.

With the reunion you have to remember that to them at that moment, it did feel right. It's how it evolved that ended up making them realised and question how they felt about it. I do agree Charlie could have worded things better about how things are now.
 
If Joey gets fired again, the band is done, and I think Scott & Charlie realize that.


At least I hope they do.
 
There could be a second Anthrax: John Bush, Danny Lilker, Dan Spitz, Paul Crook, and Greg D'Angelo. They could call it X-Thrax or something.

Neil Turbin, Dan Spitz, and Danny Lilker with another guitarist and drummer for Two Fists Full Of Metal.
 
They havent' done a single fucking headlining show. The reason they are playing to big crowds right now has ZERO to do with who their singer is. It has to do with the fact that they are touring with METALLICA...and Megadeth and Slayer (with and without Metallica)...those bands bring bigger crowds. If John would have agreed to stick around, they'd have done the same damn tours with the same attendance. So it's absurd to point to bigger concert attendance the last 2 years and say it's because of Joey. They haven't done a single fuckin' headlining show yet.

Dear John,

It's not about the live show, concert attendence. The fact is that Anthrax's Joey era was by far a much bigger band. Sold a ton more albums, played much larger headlining tours, and in general most people associate Anthrax with the Joey thrash era.

I know you like to think it would be the same if you were still in the band. But that is not true. The amount of hype that this new album is getting simply because Joey is back in the band is huge for them. If you were on vocals there would not be remotely as much hype as now.

A lot of the metal fans at these huge tours with Slayer, Metallica etc didn't even know Joey was back in the band and are now back on board and will probably go buy or at least take the time to download the new album. If you were on vocals they probably wouldn't give it the time of day.

So I know you get a little upset when Charlie or others say that Joey is a more popular choice for Anthrax but that is just a fact. You shouldn't take it so personal.
 
Easy. Great songs, better production, fatter tones, and vocals that actually match the aggression of the music for a change.

Hey John,

Better production? I think not. Don't mess with songs that are already classics. You may think you are some heavy aggressive vocalist but you really aren't.... unless you think saying 'yeahh' and 'ohhhhh' during the song makes it more aggressive. If I want more aggressive I'll listen to a bands like Slayer or Pantera. For Anthrax the albums Joey did were excellent they way there were and shouldn't be messed with. The cover band that did the TGOTE is not even close to the same caliber as the originals. Hope you have the best of luck in Armored Saint!
 
Hey John,

Better production? I think not. Don't mess with songs that are already classics. You may think you are some heavy aggressive vocalist but you really aren't.... unless you think saying 'yeahh' and 'ohhhhh' during the song makes it more aggressive. If I want more aggressive I'll listen to a bands like Slayer or Pantera. For Anthrax the albums Joey did were excellent they way there were and shouldn't be messed with. The cover band that did the TGOTE is not even close to the same caliber as the originals. Hope you have the best of luck in Armored Saint!

Agreed for the most part. I will say that prior to TGOTE, I had always wondered what a studio version of older songs would sound like with Bush singing them. I wish I could still wonder. I like John Bush, but I hated that EP or whatever you'd call it. I hope they didn't spend more than $20 making it.

Not sure why you think he's John though.
 
Need I silence every piece of trash that is spewn from your mouth most old school fans dont like John singing on those songs. And thats without mentioning the songs being changed from their original versions. Johns screams on 'Deathrider' dont really sound on par with Neil Turbins.

While I "Liked" GOTE, it could have been better....although I felt his versions of the Turbin songs were the highlights.
 
Hey John,

Better production? I think not. Don't mess with songs that are already classics. You may think you are some heavy aggressive vocalist but you really aren't.... unless you think saying 'yeahh' and 'ohhhhh' during the song makes it more aggressive. If I want more aggressive I'll listen to a bands like Slayer or Pantera. For Anthrax the albums Joey did were excellent they way there were and shouldn't be messed with. The cover band that did the TGOTE is not even close to the same caliber as the originals. Hope you have the best of luck in Armored Saint!

I'm sorry...........good for you.
 
Hey John,

Better production? I think not. Don't mess with songs that are already classics. You may think you are some heavy aggressive vocalist but you really aren't.... unless you think saying 'yeahh' and 'ohhhhh' during the song makes it more aggressive. If I want more aggressive I'll listen to a bands like Slayer or Pantera. For Anthrax the albums Joey did were excellent they way there were and shouldn't be messed with. The cover band that did the TGOTE is not even close to the same caliber as the originals. Hope you have the best of luck in Armored Saint!

Technically speaking , er, yes. Think about it, at least 14 years difference in recording and production techniques btween the last Joey era album POT and TGOTE, so by default, yes TGOTE is a better production, loud mastering notwithstanding..........
 
Technically speaking , er, yes. Think about it, at least 14 years difference in recording and production techniques btween the last Joey era album POT and TGOTE, so by default, yes TGOTE is a better production, loud mastering notwithstanding..........

There are albums that were recorded in the 60s and 70s that sound light years better than TGOTE. TGOTE sure as hell doesn't sound better than Dark Side of the Moon or Night At The Opera. Just because it was recorded recently with more modern equipment doesn't mean it's going to sound better (and it doesn't). For that matter, you give the POT or ATL master tapes to the right person (a Steve Hoffman type) to remix and I guarantee you that those original albums will sound better as well. The job Hoffman did on Master of Puppets and Ride the Lightning in the 90's sound amazing and I'm willing to bet the Anthrax discs would as well with the same type of remixing job.