Then your entire argument falls through, too, then, doesn't it? Seeing as it's not normal for metal bands to play hard core riffs, I mean.
And you obviously don't know what the "spirit of metal" means, Mr. Herman. Slipknot is a jump da fuck up sorta band, with a fucking gimmick beaten to death to make it easier to fuck stupid teenage girls. Don't make me bring examples, boy!
And I'm asking you to expand upon this in detail, instead of repeating it over and over.Dancing around? What the fuck. I just said they have a lot of influences, mostly metal.
Ad populum, not to mention defining the "metal community" for the purpose of such a poll would be difficult since you would probably want to include all the nu metal fans.Slipknot are not undeniably metal, if they were there wouldn't be these arguments every four weeks. Most people however do agree so far that they are metal and as much as you want to fuss about it, if you ask most people whether or not they are metal on the street, they will say yes. Does it matter to them that some people believe they know better hence they are right? The majority of the metal community is divided on this, and if it fell to a vote, or you asked the band, the response would be it is metal.
I don't understand this sentence, please clarify/rephrase.You are missing most of my argument in references to Slayer being heavily influenced by punk (which they were, check the reasons behind undisputed attitude) not effecting the outcome of the band.
For example?What I am trying to say is it is possible to create metal without starting off with metal, a jazz musician could come along and in experimenting create something that falls directly into the paramaters of metal without hearing any in the past, it is not impossible. Black Sabbath may have been credited with starting metal but a lot of metal bands did spring up afterwards with no link to Sabbath at all, not even hearing them in many cases.
I'd be far more likely to see your side of the argument if you'd bother to explain the points you bring up.I cannot be fucked continuing this argument, not because I dont care, but because you are going to retort with the same views over and over and it is going nowhere. Bitch about this all you want, I dont give a fuck, argue it with someone else, I have better things to do. Bands dont need to be primarily influenced by metal to fall into metal, if you disagree, fine, we will go our seperate ways. /contribution to thread
[gives up]I did read the whole thread, else I wouldn't have quoted something of every page in my first post in this thread. And alot of ppl wouldn't be so anti-slipknot if 13 year olds didn't listen to them, I'm quite sure of that.
"Significant" being the operative word in my initial comment which you have ignored. And metal has to be the primary element for a band to be considered metal. Metal has to be metal. Metal=Metal. I don't see how this is a difficult concept.He doesn't need to, you admitted it yourself right here:
Emphasis mine.
Begging the question. Who says metal needs to be the 'primary element'?
Or is this just your opinion?
Edit - You're not trying to pass off your opinion as fact, are you?
So if you have a hard time telling which of these two tabs belonged to Darkthrone or The Exploited, their respective genres would be in question? Is that the reasoning of this thread so far?
PHP:|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |---------------------------------9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-7-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-- |---------------------------------9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-7-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-9-- |-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6---7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-5-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-- |-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7----------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------| -----------------------------------------------------------------------| --9-9-9-9-9------------------------------------------------------------| --9-9-9-9-9------------------------------------------------------------| --7-7-7-7-7--7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-77-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6-6--| -------------8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-8-88-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7--|
PHP:e|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| B|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| G|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| D|----------------------------555555555555555577777777-----------------------| A|---4444442222222222---------333333333333333355555555-6-7-4444444444444444--| E|---2222220000000000----------------------------------4-5-2222222222222222--|
And this says "metal" to you rather than "rock" or "punk" or whatever because...?Have you even watched Voliminal? The guys used to bring a dead crow in a jar on stage and smell it to make themselves puke and toss it around into the crowd. Clown pisses on stage, Sid used to go into the crowd and punch up people that wouldn't do what Corey said. Those masks are a huge gimmick, but the mindset the band have with them is they put them on they are different people, they take off their mask they go back to being the father and playing Grand Piano (in reference to clown) but when they are on and they are on tour they drink piss, they sleep with girls, they drive around in a big bus headbanging and blasting loud music, they are a pretty chaotic and debauched entity.
And I'm asking you to expand upon this in detail, instead of repeating it over and over.
Ad populum, not to mention defining the "metal community" for the purpose of such a poll would be difficult since you would probably want to include all the nu metal fans.
I don't understand this sentence, please clarify/rephrase.
For example?
I'd be far more likely to see your side of the argument if you'd bother to explain the points you bring up.
[gives up]
"Significant" being the operative word in my initial comment which you have ignored. And metal has to be the primary element for a band to be considered metal. Metal has to be metal. Metal=Metal. I don't see how this is a difficult concept.
I'd assume the first is Darkthrone and the second The Exploited, the obvious difference being the use of major third intervals in the first one which is far more typical of Darkthrone and black metal than of The Exploited and hardcore punk. Unless this is some kind of trick where you are misrepresenting the bands by picking atypical examples from each. If you don't play music and understand basic theory you might as well ignore my tab examples.
And this says "metal" to you rather than "rock" or "punk" or whatever because...?
He doesn't need to, you admitted it yourself right here:
Begging the question. Who says metal needs to be the 'primary element'?
Or is this just your opinion?
Edit - You're not trying to pass off your opinion as fact, are you?
Shut up.
You have yet to explain:I have been explaining myself, I have been giving plenty of examples.
He didn't say 'traces of metal influence.' He said 'they are a band combining hardcore/grindcore/industrial/alternative/hard rock/rapcore/metal/etc.'So how exactly does admitting that a band employs traces of metal influence amount to admitting that said band is a metal band?
He's assuming that his definition of metal is fact when it is, thus far, relative.He wasn't begging the question. I see nowhere that he assumed anything that he was trying to prove. He just made a claim that you disagree with, but said claim seems pretty reasonable to me.
This is a thread concerning opinion, not factual debate. I was basically asking him if he was using 'opinion' or 'facts'. And, honestly, if he said anything about all this simply being his opinion, I wouldn't have a fuckin' leg to stand on, really.Uhhh, yeah. Isn't this what people typically do when they make claims about stuff?
'Metal=metal' makes perfect sense. What does not make sense is:"Significant" being the operative word in my initial comment which you have ignored. And metal has to be the primary element for a band to be considered metal. Metal has to be metal. Metal=Metal. I don't see how this is a difficult concept.
You have yet to explain:
- how Morbid Angel is a recognizable influence on Slipknot
- how the metal influence on Slipknot is the primary influence on their music, or conversely how a band with something other than metal as their primary influence can be considered a metal band
- How the Slayer/punk influence tangent affects Slipknot
- How "a lot of metal bands did spring up afterwards with no link to Sabbath at all", listing some of these bands would be a start
- etc.
Really, what you have been mostly doing is repeating a number of premises and then giving up when someone questions them. Also, telling people who are trying to engage in a productive discussion with you and offering to sit there and listen while you explain your position in detail to "shut up" is a poor way to get your point across.
(Edited for a grammatical error)
He didn't say 'traces of metal influence.' He said 'they are a band combining hardcore/grindcore/industrial/alternative/hard rock/rapcore/metal/etc.'
So now the burden of proof is on him. Now he has to prove how he can subtract metal from hardcore/grindcore/industrial/alternative/hard rock/rapcore/metal. That would prove Slipknot isn't metal.
He's assuming that his definition of metal is fact when it is, thus far, relative.
This is a thread concerning opinion, not factual debate. I was basically asking him if he was using 'opinion' or 'facts'. And, honestly, if he said anything about all this simply being his opinion, I wouldn't have a fuckin' leg to stand on, really.
To give you the names you oh so desire for whatever fucking reason I am bothering, Pentagram was one example from America. Other bands include the likes of Trouble, Saint Vitus, Candlemass and Pentagram.
Yeah, Spliknot is fucking kvlt.