I'd like someone to explain to me, in musical terms, what they view as the primary differences between a Death vocal, ala Mikael Stanne, and a Hardcore vocal, ala Matt of Trivium. Now, first off, I'm NOT trying to compare the quality of their vocals. I'm NOT trying to compare the quality of the music. And finally, I'm NOT intimating that I don't hear a difference. What I'm asking is, musically, what do you view as the ENORMOUS difference between the two? To the uninitiated, the differences are negligible. Both are clearly aggressive, both defy traditional vocal techniques, and both favor brutality over melody. However, one is embraced, while the other is castigated and shunned. This seems strange to me.
I recognize that traditionally, Hardcore vocals had been paired with Hardcore music, which we can all agree is shit. However, there are plenty of examples of Metal borrowing from genres which aren't typically appreciated by Metal fans. Most (not all) Metal fans don't listen to Classical or Symphonic music. Yet many Metal fans celebrate these elements when interwoven with Metal. Most (not all) Metal fans don't listen to Opera. Yet Metal bands who leverage operatic vocals are some of the most popular in Metal. So why this specially reserved disdain for pairing Hardcore vocals with Metal music? At best, it seems absurdly picky.
Zod