I hadn't hitherto correlated master guitarists against hair but I generally listen to my music rather than watch bands live or browse through photo galleries of guitarists. I find anything to do with conformity of an image due to peer pressure, embarrasement, or any other 'obligations' a sobering thought. To become a guitar master you must be committed, have focussed targets over short time scales aswell as the long term, and you have to assess your priorities. These may be as fundamental as whether you are happy with your string gauge, if you feel your guitar is sufficient, whether your amp is giving a good enough tone to allow your technical abilities to grow with high accuracy, whether you may need higher output pickups or to adjust the action, or ever whether you need a preamp or effects pedal. There are many hurdles to overcome, such as limitation of theoretical knowledge of music, or the cost of new pickups, guitars, amps, and strings; and probably the greatest hurdle of all: knowing whether your knowledge of the technical side of guitar playing, (ie, guitar action and tone etc), is allowing you to progress to the level that you want to get to, or convincing yourself that you can get as good as the wizards. With these great difficulties in an aspiring technical guitar player's life, a factor such as hair style is truly trivial. There will never be a new revolution in technical mastery in the musical world unless aspiring or near virtuosos forget all the cliches and traditions of the past, (and recent past), and use their imaginations rather than their insecurity. I believe that in a few years, guitar masters, (and maybe just as well keyboard/bass/percussion etc masters), will make as great an impact as they did in the late 80s, and although images will undoubtedly be copied before long, everyone should expect the unexpected. I used to question why I enjoyed games on the NES when I was younger; afterall, it had such bad graphics in comparison to the ps2 and other consoles. I realised that it was due to the tremendously complex songs on many of the games. There has been a poor era for computer game music, but more importantly for the entire world of music, (bar a few outposts such as Symphony X). Although the most mainstream music has always been extrememly simple and abysmal, there have been up and downs in the supposedly self respecting parts of the music industry. From 1989 onwards, most repectable musicians turned to simple saleable music, and ever since, the devoted technical music appreciators have clinged on to the few outposts of respectability such as Vinnie Moore and Symphony X. These outposts will not suffice for much longer though, as people seem to be losing patience with sell-out moves ten times as quickly as the mid 90s, (such as Marty Friedman's recent shame). It's inevitable that all conventions will be dropped after the last 13 years of deteriorating, but recently slowly recouperating music on a large scale, and shredders will once more be overshadowing the guitar spastics currently offending readers, (make that ex-readers), of guitar magazines. The shredders will start to emerge in their numbers, but possibly in a different guise?