IMO, Green Bay has a much better chance of pulling off a perfect season than NE had. The GB defense is better, and at this point, Rodgers could school Brady a bit.
Unless, of course, they decide to sit starters in the last 2-3 weeks of the season.
IMO, Green Bay has a much better chance of pulling off a perfect season than NE had. The GB defense is better, and at this point, Rodgers could school Brady a bit.
http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post?id=33128
Rodgers is actually beating 07 Brady in YPA. So no, the Packers are technically more explosive.Let's also look at the difference in the quality of the divisional opponents the '07 Patriots faced, vs the '11 Packers. Rodgers also doesn't have Randy Moss to just lob it up to.
Not dominant enough to win the only game that counts, and not dominant enough to not need some serious referee bullshit against the Ravens. I smell sour grapes.
Edit: Again, regarding PA between the Pats and Packers, lets look at divisional opponent quality:
07
Dolphins
Bills
Jets
All with a losing record.
11
Bears
Lions
Vikings
2 teams in the playoff chase.
It will be quite interesting to see how the final statistics shake out, and of course, the most important one.
Bull fucking shit. The Ravens suck man.
Saw some interesting stats on how bad the GB rush offense and defense is. Of course, Rodgers can toss 300 yds and 3 tds in his sleep, so kind of negates that.
The only 2 QBs in the NFC who can hope to hang with Rodgers are Brees and Romo.