You're saying that from the standpoint of a person who listens to mainly genres where ideology is a total non-factor, which you can't do, as black metal is not one of those genres. You can't analyze a genre based on factors that define another.Setting black metal's fart-huffing self-congratulating about "art" aside, the contradiction is purely aesthetic and in the end the music should speak for itself. If you come across a black metal band and you like how it sounds, and then discover it's Christian, deciding afterwards that it sucks sounds like a massive poseur move to me.
You're saying that from the standpoint of a person who listens to mainly genres where ideology is a total non-factor, which you can't do, as black metal is not one of those genres. You can't analyze a genre based on factors that define another.
And like it or not, black metal is based in ideology and must be analyzed as such. To not do so, is to have a flawed, surface-level understanding of it.
And when you combine Christianity and black metal, it literally just ceases to be either. It may sound like black metal, it may look like black metal. But you cannot be a part of a genre when you are an affront to everything the genre represents.
Same as how black metal is an affront to Christianity. The two are just diametrically opposed; oil and water do not mix. And no amount of cheap buzzwords like "fart-huffing" will change that.
I Black metal at its core is anti-Christian/religion and pro-pagan/satanist. Nevertheless, it has definitely evolved to become a musically stylistic genre as well. What do you call a modern black metal band that doesn't have those ideologies, but still sounds like straight up BM?
If you're telling me I could start a band, totally rip off a song by Darkthrone or Mayhem, change the lyrics to be about God defeating Satan, and it magically becomes not black metal, that's absolutely retarded.
Sure. Music is mainly music, then anything else.
What is hard to argue is that black metal is a style that is quite more closed in terms of lyrical themes than the rest of the metal styles. The style's early and ongoing elitism, plus the deeper "urban tribe" subculture around it push the members of those groups to be far more personally involved with the style, thus making the product to meet certain "requirements" to be recognized as such by the other members of that self imposed group.
What it means is that black metal isn't a musical genre, if the music itself can be disqualified based on how it's dressed up.
Danzig confirmed for Black Metal
Liturgy and Deafheaven are a joke for the black metal community and the vast majority of black metal bands still sing about the same shit that people did on early 90's.Not true. Just look at Liturgy and Sunbather. The era of elitist neo-fascist gatekeeping is over. WE are the new black metal.
If black metal faggots had any consistency they'd admit that Slayer was an essential founding black metal band, but they don't because it makes other parts of the narrative complicated.
Liturgy and Deafheaven are a joke for the black metal community and the vast majority of black metal bands still sing about the same shit that people did on early 90's.