@HemeHaci:
I agree, disproving the existence of something that cannot be proved to exist is impossible.
Modern science can't explain everything we face, but that's only a matter of time before the non explainable phenomena will be revealed.
But there is another way of looking at it: Science never "explains" things. With Newton's laws of motion (which are a special case of quantum mechanics applied to low velocities) we know that f = m * a (in low velocities) and therefore we can predict where a cannonball will land when we launch it. BUT, we don't know "why" f = m * a, or whatever quantum dynamics formula spawned it, is correct. If some "formula" underlies those, we won't know what underlies that formula... and so on.
So according to this way of looking at the problem, science can merely evaluate what has happened before and based on that, can predict what is going to happen. But at the very core of those, it can't explain "why" that has to happen.
But, this is only a way of looking at it and there are hundreds of other ways. I'm not defending anything, I am just trying to bring the matter down to the core; the faith.
It all comes down a matter of faith in whether you believe "we must have a purpose, all those can't be in vain" or "there is no scientific reason to believe".
You might think "Science can explain everything, so there is no need for a God." or "Science can't really 'explain' the core of things, because in the core of things there is God - Allah - Odin etc."
... good to see he made some sort of impact after all. yet again, i value his intentions and his way of thinking, but that is NOT my way of thinking, so please PLEASE stop acting as if all atheists have the exact same arguments and way of thinking! ... everytime i mention i'm an atheist somebody starts with these puny comments as if they already know exactly what i think because they heard some scientist say things once! atheists are a vast and diverse group, we don't follow doctrines ... therefore we can tell many different stories leading to similar conclusions. This gives us actually an extra strenght against religions which do follow the same doctrines, although modern religious people often try to avoid it by giving it some personal twists (invalid as they may be often).
