Opeth : The Ghost Reveries

Apr 9, 2004
235
0
16
what can i say....fucking amazing !!!

production to songwriting to riffs to singing


just jaw droppingg....looks like jens bogren is pretty fucking cool on production too !
 
Seems like a better than expected album to me. Quite good. I'm not the fanboy I used to be and this hasn't made me a raving loony Opeth madman again, but I think I'll get some good listens out of it.

Just don't tell them you downloaded it or they'll hit you with a brick and ban your forum in a big irrational rage.
 
Dude, almost everything ever is on Soulseek or Limewire.. .and those programs are free anyways















Or so I've heard...........

>.>
<.<
 
what is so wrong with just listening to the tracks that Roadrunner have made available and then buying it when it comes out. was it really that irrational that Opeth shut down their board?.. i'm not so sure. i know what you'll all say... "i'll buy it, but i just can't wait to hear it". i'm sure it's provable that over half the people who say that never follow through, even if they love the album... that's the way it is with my circle of friends and aqaintances. and given that this is the case, i think labels and bands have a right to be protective of their music .. especially before it isn't even released. and anyway, the band doesn't WANT their new CD leaked, ok?.. so if you blatantly engage in doing so anyway you are showing them no respect at all as people... so why should they show you the respect of providing you a forum to disregard their feelings in?
 
James Murphy said:
what is so wrong with just listening to the tracks that Roadrunner have made available and then buying it when it comes out. was it really that irrational that Opeth shut down their board?.. i'm not so sure. i know what you'll all say... "i'll buy it, but i just can't wait to hear it". i'm sure it's provable that over half the people who say that never follow through, even if they love the album... that's the way it is with my circle of friends and aqaintances. and given that this is the case, i think labels and bands have a right to be protective of their music .. especially before it isn't even released. and anyway, the band doesn't WANT their new CD leaked, ok?.. so if you blatantly engage in doing so anyway you are showing them no respect at all as people... so why should they show you the respect of providing you a forum to disregard their feelings in?

I agree, most people don't follow through with it. I am a firm believer in testing a product before you buy it. I have been burned far too many times by bands claiming that this is a "great" release when I discover only 2 songs I like--slightly like. I LOVED it when Andy "leaked" the Nevermore album; even though it had his "Darth Vader" voice on it. It gave me a chance to see what it was like. I prebought 2 copies, 1 for my house and 1 for my car after hearing it. It is a great idea. I think all bands should do the same thing similar to what Nevermore did.

Despite the fact, I dont care if most people "dont follow through"... All I know is that I will buy it if I like it. Heck, if you dont like it, then delete and/or destroy it. I mean, afterall, if you dont like it enough to buy it, why keep it on a CD-R or on my harddrive taking up valuable space?

Here Here :kickass: :Smug:
 
I agree with you, James, I think Opeth has every right to shut their board down. Leaks are a bummer and "Ghost Reveries" doesn't come out for a while.

I have honestly bought every leaked album I've ever downloaded, but I know I'm the exception...
 
Kazrog said:
I agree with you, James, I think Opeth has every right to shut their board down. Leaks are a bummer and "Ghost Reveries" doesn't come out for a while.

I have honestly bought every leaked album I've ever downloaded, but I know I'm the exception...

Ditto to Mr. Kazrog :Smug:
 
James Murphy said:
what is so wrong with just listening to the tracks that Roadrunner have made available and then buying it when it comes out. was it really that irrational that Opeth shut down their board?.. i'm not so sure. i know what you'll all say... "i'll buy it, but i just can't wait to hear it". i'm sure it's provable that over half the people who say that never follow through, even if they love the album... that's the way it is with my circle of friends and aqaintances. and given that this is the case, i think labels and bands have a right to be protective of their music .. especially before it isn't even released. and anyway, the band doesn't WANT their new CD leaked, ok?.. so if you blatantly engage in doing so anyway you are showing them no respect at all as people... so why should they show you the respect of providing you a forum to disregard their feelings in?



Personally I don't feel I am disrespecting the band because I do buy things that I like especially, I've bought most of Opeth's CDs and their DVD and shirts and I talk to my friends about them (hey, free advertising!), and play their songs on guitar and so on. As I see it if I download an album and don't like it there's no reason I should buy it, so there is also a try before you buy factor there.

However it's often not always the same with other groups but that usually is because of the following reasons:

#1. I like obscure music that is hard to find at stores (I lack a credit card or means to buy online), meaning often I have to resort to downloading it.

#2. I often don't have enough money to purchase music. Does that mean I should just not listen to music!? Doesn't sound fair to me...if I download because I can't afford to buy, well the band may not make any money, but I at least get to appreciate their work.

#3. As a person who sometimes has strong opinions I usually like to hear before buying to know whether it is worth buying. I support quality music so I'd feel shit about buying an album by my favourite band that actually isn't any good, I'd rather support something that makes me go 'FUCK THIS RULES!'.

#4. Also on that point I'm so obsessed with music that if I only heard stuff through purchases I'd know nothing compared to what I know now, would be much shitter at guitar and basically be stupid. That's no good. Downloading music has educated me on actual music so much...exposed me to so many good things. The preconception is people download just to spite bands and artists...so wrong, I do it because I love music and must hear. :yell:


The way I see it getting rid of their forum is a SLAP in the face of their fans, because it shows that they don't give a shit about their personal situation (i.e the fact a lot of them WILL buy the album or some can't really afford CDs and just want to hear their favourite band), and that they don't mind saying 'fuck off' to a whole BUNCH of dedicated, genuine good fans just to get rid of a few bad eggs. Like hitting in a nail with a sledge-hammer.

That said I'm not angry at them about it and bear no grudges, I just think it was dumb and tactless.

No offence but it seems that when people hit it big their views on downloading get really distorted. As an artist I'm going to always try and encourage people to download if they must, but let them know I'd love their financial support. In this day and age it seems wrong to me to just block out the whole downloading issues so harshly, or be so judgemental about it.
 
Kazrog said:
I have honestly bought every leaked album I've ever downloaded, but I know I'm the exception...


And no, that's no me as well. I have a LOT of leaked albums I've never bought but I stand by that, and don't feel guilty. I know they've put alot of work into the music and expect money but I really feel that downloading an artist's music won't really destroy their life. I'm never going to tell people they can't download my music...even if I eventually get an album proper done...
 
Static said:
#2. I often don't have enough money to purchase music. Does that mean I should just not listen to music!? Doesn't sound fair to me...if I download because I can't afford to buy, well the band may not make any money, but I at least get to appreciate their work.

This is why I started stealing cars. Just because I can't afford a BMW doesn't mean I shouldn't enjoy the pleasure of driving (and wrecking) one.
 
Static said:
And no, that's no me as well. I have a LOT of leaked albums I've never bought but I stand by that, and don't feel guilty. I know they've put alot of work into the music and expect money but I really feel that downloading an artist's music won't really destroy their life. I'm never going to tell people they can't download my music...even if I eventually get an album proper done...

It costs money to make music. I support all the bands I like, because I know that they have to work for their money. Apparently, you don't work for yours. Please send me some money via PayPal to shane@backmask.com, I could use it to help pay for some of my recent gear purchases.

Thanks, much appreciated!
 
egan. said:
This is why I started stealing cars. Just because I can't afford a BMW doesn't mean I shouldn't enjoy the pleasure of driving (and wrecking) one.


Although that sounds like a good analogy I don't think it works because the situation is so different, and you know it. I mean a car isn't made for the express purpose of being exposed to other people like music (unless you are a complete poser). A car is not a piece of art intended for public consumption.
 
Kazrog said:
It costs money to make music. I support all the bands I like, because I know that they have to work for their money. Apparently, you don't work for yours. Please send me some money via PayPal to shane@backmask.com, I could use it to help pay for some of my recent gear purchases.

Thanks, much appreciated!


I'm of the belief that artists need to support themselves outside of their music, and I think it would be nice to make a living off music but not essential. I know money is important to artists but all this hoo-hah over mp3s just seems egotistical and money grubbing considering that I feel the harm done is exaggerated.

And this is just my opinion, there is no need to be offended by it and I FULLY respect the opinions of others, whether I agree or not.

I don't get why I'm supposed to feel guilty about downloading music I love. I spend what I can on music, that's enough.
 
Static said:
I'm of the belief that artists need to support themselves outside of their music, and I think it would be nice to make a living off music but not essential. I know money is important to artists but all this hoo-hah over mp3s just seems egotistical and money grubbing considering that I feel the harm done is exaggerated.

And this is just my opinion, there is no need to be offended by it and I FULLY respect the opinions of others, whether I agree or not.

I don't get why I'm supposed to feel guilty about downloading music I love. I spend what I can on music, that's enough.

So it's up to you to decide how I should make my money? What if I told you that I feel it is necesarry for me to quit my day job in order to fully realize all of the things I want to do with music? I want to dedicate myself 100% to music, but unfortunately, the context of economics necessitates that I work a day job until I can support myself through music. If I am unable to support myself through music, my music ultimately suffers because I am not able to produce the quality/quantity of output I'd like to in a reasonable period of time.

By your logic, you should be able to walk into a store and steal from them because it doesn't "destroy their life." Downloading music without paying for it ultimately is the same thing as shoplifting.

The irony of the situation that your type of attitude is perpetuating is this: by stealing music, you are making it so that the only people that can have succesful careers in music are rich kids and the pop/fashion artists that labels throw major marketing budget behind. Downloading hurts the hard-working artists out there like Opeth the most.

I'm not saying you shouldn't download leaks. Hell, I'm listening to fucking "Ghost Reveries" as I type this, and I am loving it. I have also, as always, marked all of the mp3s as "leak" so that I remember to buy the album when it comes out.

Ultimatley what will solve this problem is: the day an album is mastered, the label should release it on iTunes. Then everyone can download the album legitimately and there's less of a motivation to go hunting for the "leak." Labels like Roadrunner are hurting their artists by sending out literally thousands of promo copies of an album to interns who will inevitably leak the album on the internet months before it is released.

By the time albums are released, everyone forgets they haven't bought them, and are in many cases already sick of the albums they downloaded the leak of. You, Static, are a part of this problem by rationalizing your illegal behavior.
 
Kazrog said:
So it's up to you to decide how I should make my money? What if I told you that I feel it is necesarry for me to quit my day job in order to fully realize all of the things I want to do with music? I want to dedicate myself 100% to music, but unfortunately, the context of economics necessitates that I work a day job until I can support myself through music. If I am unable to support myself through music, my music ultimately suffers because I am not able to produce the quality/quantity of output I'd like to in a reasonable period of time.

My philosophy is different because my situation is different I suppose. I don't fully support myself right now (parents and such), but when that changes maybe my opinion will be subject to change, I don't know. I've seen how money can destroy integrity though, and I really don't like that shit, so although I'm hellbent on music I'm going to try and keep going but not let money dictate things.

I just think it is realistic of me (especially considering the country I live in, NZ, that has a really DEAD music industry) to support my music through work where I can and not worry so much about the money. Bah, tricky subject.

By your logic, you should be able to walk into a store and steal from them because it doesn't "destroy their life." Downloading music without paying for it ultimately is the same thing as shoplifting.

An mp3 is not a tangible product that has been packaged, prepared and distributed through commercial channels. It is just a copy of something, and copies of things are much less valuable than the official piece. I can see how you could perceive it as stealing, but I see few enough similarities with actual products to feel bad about taking it.

The irony of the situation that your type of attitude is perpetuating is this: by stealing music, you are making it so that the only people that can have succesful careers in music are rich kids and the pop/fashion artists that labels throw major marketing budget behind. Downloading hurts the hard-working artists out there like Opeth the most.

I see it as the opposite actually. If I didn't download music (and I do so because of the recommendations of forums and the net) I wouldn't know about any artists other than the popular artists, so if I did actually go to the store to buy an album (and I do WHEN I CAN) it would be by some shitty band I'd seen on TV or other. If I didn't download music the underground would not get ANY of my money FULLSTOP, cos I wouldn't know any of these artists anyways, or what in the underground was worth buying

I'm not saying you shouldn't download leaks. Hell, I'm listening to fucking "Ghost Reveries" as I type this, and I am loving it. I have also, as always, marked all of the mp3s as "leak" so that I remember to buy the album when it comes out.

That's admirable of you, but seems a bit excessive. If the album was shit I would not want to buy it...

It is a good album though and I've got the money so I will go buy it when I get the chance.

Ultimatley what will solve this problem is: the day an album is mastered, the label should release it on iTunes. Then everyone can download the album legitimately and there's less of a motivation to go hunting for the "leak." Labels like Roadrunner are hurting their artists by sending out literally thousands of promo copies of an album to interns who will inevitably leak the album on the internet months before it is released.

Oh well, it is not regulated as such now so I await that day.

By the time albums are released, everyone forgets they haven't bought them, and are in many cases already sick of the albums they downloaded the leak of. You, Static, are a part of this problem by rationalizing your illegal behavior.

I totally disagree.

See my behaviour is illegal but I don't see it as inherently bad.

This is the bottom line:

I don't download an album.

Outcome: I never hear the artist. I never buy their album (if I would choose to). They never get my money. I know less about music, I gravitate towards shitty music. I make less music. I love music less.

EVERYBODY LOSES!

I feel that artists should stop living in the dark ages and embrace this digital medium. The fans would like them more and in likelihood buy their music even more.

I could probably express my opinion better or something but you get the general idea...
 
I just started reading this and if I don't reply this issue is going to bore a hole in my head.

First off, if one doesn't have a credit card to buy things online, the prices in record stores for metal albums is obscene. FUCKING PERIOD. There is no reason, NONE, why I should have to fork over up to $17 dollars for a disk I haven't heard yet, or that I like but am not going totally ape shit over. CD duplication has been able to come down in price due to the technology becoming so accesible, that the prices that some of the record companies are charging are just wrong. I haven't picked up the new Machine Head disk, because I haven't found it at a local store for less then $15.99. I don't mind giving the band money for shows, shirts, and what have you ( and trust me I have a massive collection of these sorts of things). I do have a problem giving this much money to a record company, who in turn, is not going to give a reasonable amount of profits over to the band for said music. That being said, in this type of music, the way that you make a living is touring your ass off and selling merchandise. And with the prices of some of the stuff out there, I'm somewhat reluctant, but I've done it to support the bands I like.

There is this split between people wanting to be heard, and not giving away their art/soul/music for free. It's a very hard line to walk. I see both sides of the argument, and I'm not going to tell you that either of you is wrong. I wouldn't be listening to half the bands I listen to had I not downloaded them. I wouldn't have paid for tickets to their shows, bought merchandise etc. Personally, with this type of music, I know I will be working a day job for a very long time. I make shit wages compared to others. But I try and do my best to spend my money where needed and in support of the very thing that keeps my life blood flowing. However, you can be damned that I'm going to buy another In Flames album on good faith...EVER! It will be downloaded first. Should I pay for it, for one listen? I don't know, do I get the money back if the album blows ass? Probably not.

All art seems to be neglected in some aspect or another. The type of music we listen to is becoming more widely accepted and publicized, but that still doesn't mean that it's going to get easier. I'm with the side that agrees that the music should be heard, no matter what. I'm for letting people hear my music for free. If they can help support me then good, if they can't, but can enjoy it for what it is, and it speaks to them and shows them something, then I did my job. It may take a little longer because I waste my time 8 hours a day doing something monkeys could just as easily do. Do you know what that means, the time that I have to work on that stuff has to be more productive. Besides, if you could sit around all day, before you got signed, before you toured, and just write music, would you actually write, or would you get caught up on the 10,000 other stupid things there are to do, like play grand theft auto, and masterbate to shampoo commercials? I could probably be exagerrating that point, the bottom line is that if you put your energy towards it, your hard work will pay off in the end. Maybe not monetarily, but by the reactions of those people who truly appreciate what you do. No price tag required.

Hopefully this doesn't perpetuate the war. I honestly do see both sides of the argument. We can both argue whats right and wrong, I can sit here all night and bitch about this, but I won't. Hopefully this brings some understanding. If not.....oh well..

Lykis