DoomsdayZach
The Professor was right
Oh, and thanks for reminding me to get out my Brainstorm. Fucking ROCKIN' band that i always forget about. Nothing special, but Andy's vocals rule and they are solid as fuck.
I think if you want to compare two bands based on popularity, then by default Linkin Park and Korn are MUCH better than symphony x and have a FAR bigger and more important place in music. But that just doesn't jive, now does it?
Virgin Steele, for my money, are a superior band because they write music that is more up my alley. I'd recommend people check them out and do some decent research since the early stuff and the newer stuff are two completely different animals. Sure, it's all a matter of opinion and I wouldn't expect people to have the same opinion as me on the Symphony X official forum, but there it is. I'd kill to see Virgin Steele live man. They have to rock, plus David's voice is just insane.
quick edit: schenk, i'm mostly playing devil's advocate here because it's funny, but it really is silly to say that because a band has largely gone under the radar for a few decades yet still puts out awesome material that they are of a lower standard than another younger band who happened to get lucky. You don't listen to anything that's better than symphony x (again, personal opinion) but has gone largely unnoticed for a few decades? Another band i'll throw out there that has the same status in america: Running Wild. Fucking phenomenal band, has almost no buzz these days. Fucking shameful.
Oh, and thanks for reminding me to get out my Brainstorm. Fucking ROCKIN' band that i always forget about. Nothing special, but Andy's vocals rule and they are solid as fuck.
I think if you want to compare two bands based on popularity, then by default Linkin Park and Korn are MUCH better than symphony x and have a FAR bigger and more important place in music. But that just doesn't jive, now does it?
Virgin Steele, for my money, are a superior band because they write music that is more up my alley. I'd recommend people check them out and do some decent research since the early stuff and the newer stuff are two completely different animals. Sure, it's all a matter of opinion and I wouldn't expect people to have the same opinion as me on the Symphony X official forum, but there it is. I'd kill to see Virgin Steele live man. They have to rock, plus David's voice is just insane.
quick edit: schenk, i'm mostly playing devil's advocate here because it's funny, but it really is silly to say that because a band has largely gone under the radar for a few decades yet still puts out awesome material that they are of a lower standard than another younger band who happened to get lucky. You don't listen to anything that's better than symphony x (again, personal opinion) but has gone largely unnoticed for a few decades? Another band i'll throw out there that has the same status in america: Running Wild. Fucking phenomenal band, has almost no buzz these days. Fucking shameful.
Who knows... when they're done kicking out key/founding members? Oh wait... they are done with that *grumbles*Brainstorm does kick ass...and as for Savage Circus, when the fuck are they gonna release a damn followup to Dreamland Manor?? Fargin bastages
Sure i can. And i did. Go ahead and put in any other band. How about Disturbed? Or Slipknot? Both bands are younger (as far as duration of the band's life) than symphony x, yet enjoy far more fame. What about The Sword, Trivium, or those kinds of bands? My point is that sometimes a band gets a bigger push and simply get a little lucky. Virgin Steele has great songs and have worked hard as any band for 25 years. I'm not implying that symphony x doesn't deserve anything, i'm saying that sometimes bands who work hard and kick ass get the shaft in the grand scheme of things.You cannot possibly compare the MTV fangirl buzz that gave Linkin Park success with the detailed scrutiny of the progressive metal community that gave Symphony X success, and call both bands "lucky" in the same way. That's disingenuous and simply not fair to Symphony X. There are different metrics of success in different genres, and while it is ultimately a very subjective thing, you simply cannot with a straight face make the analogy "Linkin Park is to Symphony X as Symphony X is to _____."
We don't have the same tastes in music it seems, so i don't expect much from doing this. Keep in mind, neither of these bands are prog.Put up some of your favorite tracks from Virgin Steele or Running Wild, because I want to give them a chance--I just listened to a few from each and found nothing special. In fact, all the songs I heard sounded the same and it makes perfect sense (to me at least) why they never made the same splash that DWOT did. But I'll give a fair listen to anything you put up that is in your opinion worthy of fame.
Sure i can. And i did. Go ahead and put in any other band. How about Disturbed? Or Slipknot? Both bands are younger (as far as duration of the band's life) than symphony x, yet enjoy far more fame. What about The Sword, Trivium, or those kinds of bands? My point is that sometimes a band gets a bigger push and simply get a little lucky. Virgin Steele has great songs and have worked hard as any band for 25 years. I'm not implying that symphony x doesn't deserve anything, i'm saying that sometimes bands who work hard and kick ass get the shaft in the grand scheme of things.
We don't have the same tastes in music it seems, so i don't expect much from doing this. Keep in mind, neither of these bands are prog.
I'd kill to see Virgin Steele live man. They have to rock, plus David's voice is just insane.
Hahaha fucking killer Do they kick ass live?
Hey could we start enforcing some infractions/banning?? This is obvious troll/spam!
Hahaha fucking killer Do they kick ass live?