Mikael was just making an observation about his new "fan"base.
Once again all my comments aren't directly to you Landberk. But ok, let's go...
If he comes up to make a close watch on his new fan base, that's ok. He can do whatever he wants... but as soon as he does it only partially, some people (like me) will controvert his arguments. The point is, why are his observations on his new fan base limited to those guys criticizing his choices and judgements? Doesn't he also have another new fan base of a completely new "breed"? I'm talking about those ones I've mentioned in my previous post. But, well, although they're also a "new breed of Opeth fans", maybe they aren't idiot to Mikael... because they're not annoying to him!?!?!?!? Having sheeps supporting everything you do is great, isn't it? Ewes that do not contest your thoughts, statements, judgements, ideas, musical direction. Wow, those are great fans... they don't bring any "problem"! But... are those really the smart ones? I don't think so.
Questioning the work of an artist, a band, an idol, and keeping a critical eye even on things you love is much more intelligent than agreeing with everything an artist does or releases. Besides, it helps the artists
(not in the way it was done, I agree), because an outside observation may see things people inside the band, including the leader, would NEVER realize. This works in every field of life. People are not THAT powerful to analyse their own life, judgements, decisions, COMPLETELY and PROPERLY. An outside look is always welcome. If it's not, if there's someone so self-sufficient, so this one should lock himself in a room... don't ever go to work, don't ever start a band, don't ever do anything that involves other people.
It's quite sad to realize that the board of an unique, non-commercial, brilliant band like Opeth is 90% either "fanboys" or "sheeps". I'd expect Opeth fans to be more critical. I haven't been seeing this critical side (not very often) on this board. The other way round, seemingly 90% of the posts come from either "fanboys" or "sheeps".
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see it as that huge of deal. I think it's hella opposite than cowardly to defend a friend though, and that's all he was doing. If he did it rudely, so be it.
He is defending himself and his band prior to defending a friend. After all, he makes a living out of this band... and fans criticizing the upcoming album when its creative process just neared started isn't a good thing to the album, thereafter also to the band he makes a living out of. Let's avoid twisting things in a way it looks like Mikael was a GOD in his statement, a courageous and brave guy in an altruistic act defending his friend. It was not about this.
You know... Landberk (now directly to you, obviously). Maybe he was not as bad as I'm probably "painting" here, but he wasn't definitely half as good as you're painting it. Two sides to every story. I just don't agree with his attitude and post... and do you know what happens in this new breed of Opeth fans if you don't agree with anything the ALMIGHTY Mikael Akerfeldt does or says? This:
Whoops! I think you just made your death sentence there!
You're absolutely right Tubbs.
However I won't make reverence to everything Mikael does. Musically I would use this
emoticon one thousand times. I'd probably use it also in other occasions... maybe in another post of him. Not this one. If this is my death sentence on this board, so be it.