Erik said:why? because people like you can't be arsed to make research or think before speaking?
or to get cheap publicity (like a Britney/Madonna on-stage kiss) and harvest the attention of dissafected kids.Opeth17 said:to send a message or become the easy rallying sign for anti-christianity.
if two religions/philosophical systems use the same term for a certain concept you should not assume that both are the exact same thing. for example, norse mythology's "hel" or "hell" is not the same as judeo-christian "hell" and you'd be pretty dumbfucked to argue that. this is kinda the same thing. CORRELATION does not mean EQUALITY. also i do not give a shit about what religions are "major" and which are not. i thought people into metal would be the sort of people to not dismiss the non-mainstream, whether in music or belief.Furious B said:by choosing a name that's ALREADY ESTABLISHED by another MAJOR religion and using it as your own, doesn't it make sense that most people will make a CORRELATION with said religion?
i just have a difficult time tolerating blatant stupidity and ignorance is allFurious B said:ps. what's your beef with life and people and stuff erik?
Erik said:i thought people into metal would be the sort of people to not dismiss the non-mainstream, whether in music or belief.
sure that statement is correct, but are you dumber than a box of hammers? i'm specifically talking about the people i am arguing with in this thread and/or the people that frequent this forum.lizard said:no offense but you're giving metal fans WAY too much credit. I understand what you're saying, but a pretty significant percentage of metal fans are dumber than a box of hammers.
Agreed. However, "Satan" as a symbol of opposition to Christianity, at least makes sense on some level. There's much worth opposing in Christianity's history, as well as its current incarnation. However, to remove Christianity from the equation, leaves you with what exactly?Erik said:CORRELATION does not mean EQUALITY.
General Zod said:Support of a "dark" system, suggests opposition to a system of "light". Assuming traditional use of the concepts of "light" and "dark", why would anyone actually want "darkness" to prevail?
I've read the MLO web site. And I have no desire to further dedicate any more of my time to this D & D silliness.Erik said:zod seriously. READ before you attempt to discuss this.
Whatever dude.Erik said:you're not only way out in the fields, you're in the wrong field with an albanian tractor. i'm done unless you are going to discuss this from a valid standpoint.