so that's what you have to do in order to drink for free. the next time a waitress spills three drinks on me, i'll flood the place.rahvin said:i ended up drinking for free, but a grand total of about three beers due to my being otherwise busy for most of the time.
Miolo said:so that's what you have to do in order to drink for free. the next time a waitress spills three drinks on me, i'll flood the place.![]()
right, i had forgot about that misadventure of yours. this in turn reminds me of an ex girlfriend of mine faking to be pissed off while we were sitting at a bar's table, getting up and pretending to leave the scene dramatically, thinking for a whole minute about some more tragic gesture to add to the pantomime, and then slowly and determinedly upturning a glass of water on the table, in what was possibly the slowest and least believeable fit of rage in the history of humanity. rahvin said:need to protect myself with some armour of coldness
at the thought of looking like a member of Metallium. Actually drinks get me more fluffy, not less.might do it later today, i have fuck all to do this week-end/lifetime. just fwd it to me again. we'll start a new thread with it, it's just too funny.hyena said:(if it was in english i'd post it here for everyone's entertainment. do you want to try your hand at translation?).
one thing is being direct when it comes to something else, be it politics or your views on pineapples - god knows i'd be quite outspoken on that - and quite another if the object of the discussion is yourselves. i might get in your face with someone who cares for me when it comes to, say, music, but i'd hardly do it if she's trying to take an interest in my personality.i also think that in a way i made the same mistake last night because he casually mentioned his political affinity with the 1968 movements and i made evil faces, plus he said he wanted to go to today's demonstration and i said something to the effect of stop consorting with the enemy (and no, i was not talking about heather love this time). it was a good night as far as lack of acceptance goes.
well, you keep silent because the other option is saying: "oh, everything would be quite fine if i could just have you, ya know?" in a very offhand way, then dropping off a cliff in a likewise offhand way.i keep as silent as a jellyfish when my own sentimental life is concerned, and if he doesn't see my game he's bound to think that i don't trust him. how ludicrous.
rahvin said:@hyena: well, we'll talk soon, but let me start here. there is no excuse for such remarks on his part. let's not even get into the matter at hand: harsh responses to obvious manifestations of interest are plain carelessness in action. were you trying to bring him down? were you manipulating his words to your own advantage? nope. you wanted to hear the full story, plunge into the dark recesses of his mind without a snorkel and never come up for air again, if possible. how this could be lost to someone who's entertaining a score of hapless women breathing down his neck and up his navel (sorry), i'll never know.
the name of the game is, he thinks you might become annoying because you care. and it takes too much energy for him to clarify himself at your benefit: a state of poetic confusion suits him better than the higher ground of understanding you purport and solicit with your input. this of course takes us back to the scourge of the century (which century? which scourge?): cowardice. and it's much too late for us to feign tolerance in the face of what we most despise: to all those who want to sit back and enjoy the comfortable, pitiful ride while we offer 10x, well, too bad.