BeliUmberto
Member
- Apr 9, 2009
- 54
- 0
- 6
Alcohol, tobacco and weed should all be illegal since they are poison in their long term effects and turn men into couch potatoes for short term.
Tobbaco does damage to the lungs.
Marijuana does damage to the brain cells.
thats the main difference..
It would be better if governments made money out of it instead of criminal drug dealers though.
Don't forget that legalising pot would open the door for the legalisation of tons of other drugs that have been unjustly demonised by government propaganda. Pot is more or less a 'cheap buzz' in the grand scheme of things, but hallucinogens have had a prominent role in religion for millennia, and many people consider them a very important part of spirituality. Not to mention that a lot of classic art and music in recent history was inspired by psychedelics.
Yeah, I've heard the penalty for crack is like 10+ times worse than for cocaine. But of course our entire drug policy system is a big joke, so that's pretty much par for the course.
you havent thought very deeply if you believe that is all drugs effect and bring harm. So have a few kids.... you really care about... then get back to me
Just because it's traceable doesn't mean they can't test for a certain amount of it in your system. They do that with alcohol anyway - if you blow under a certain level, you don't get in trouble. What's so impossible about this?
I'll assume you mean "even though alcohol is legal". Anyway, I really don't know what kind of a point you think you have here, because even if they don't allow people to grow it themselves, it will clearly still be more beneficial to pot smokers for the drug to be legal. Even if it's taxed and regulated to the point of absurdity, it will at least be out in the open, and people will see that pot is not actually the Devil. Gradually it will gain more support, and the restrictions will be loosened further. It's just nonsensical to oppose legalisation if it doesn't make pot 100%, no-strings-attached legal.
You can definitely go to jail for getting caught repeatedly with pot. I don't know what percentage of drug imprisonments are due to pot (and my fucking work place is blocking the Wikipedia article on drug laws due to too many occurrences of the word 'drugs'), but I'm pretty sure the majority of people in jail are there for drug-related crimes, which is ridiculous.
If the government weren't so goddamn heavy-handed and moralistic about drug policy, we'd be spending billions less per year jailing people for 'offenses' that harm no one but themselves, and our police would be more available to enforce laws that actually help society rather than make criminals out of people who are doing no harm to others.
You havent had enough time in the world to witness tax money flying out your pocket like no tomorrow it would be of NO benefit to smokers. Anyone with enough time in and around the drug culture would never deny the negative effect drugs have on people and certainly would never say "people realise how much safer and less addictive they are than alcohol and tobacco"... makes me want to ask you what drug are you on......Like I said, you're missing the point. Having weed legal and taxed is of greater benefit to pot-smokers, and pretty much the entire pro-drug movement around the world, than having it illegal and suppressed with an iron fist. Once formerly-illegal drugs gain enough support and people realise how much safer and less addictive they are than alcohol and tobacco, the taxes will most likely go down. At any rate, I really don't care if you "have a problem with" the government making money off of drugs. I'd rather the government make money off of them and put that money to use somehow than just waste billions of dollars in a pointless war on drugs.
Um, because if it's legal then they don't have to worry about getting caught, fined, having their property confiscated, losing their jobs, and becoming unemployable for any company that requires a security clearance? I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you.![]()
I think the drug related murders are a good thing. Not the best population control but a good start and in the right area. sorry, no compassion thereThis is just silly. Corporations don't murder people on the streets like drug dealers do.
Oh really ? So now the crack head, heroin, ect. addict wont be a scumbag anymore to get their hands on the money needed no matter what it takes ? Whos silly ?Legalising drugs makes the violent crime surrounding the drug trade disappear.
And you might as well be calling corporations "scumbags" for every other business they engage in. It's called capitalism, and it's how our economy works.
Fuck capitalism, and fuck our capitalistically FUCKED economy... yeah, I know how it works... do you ?
So I guess you boys havent been around enough yet to see someone fry their brains on acid ? No harm there, no familys suffering, no body carrying the burden of their now emotionally handycaped child... no drug burnouts on welfare... hows that go ? riight....
So you only get a slap on the wrist for coke ? riight... I know an ass wipe that got put away for years and I applauded. He had so many girls all fucked up in the head, coke whores, nervous issues, most are still single and look like shit, nobody wants them, but guess what they didnt start out that way.
Did I hear someone mention signing for something in a drug store ? Gee, I noticed everyone side stepped the little drug store issue. Now hows this gonna work? you just walk in a buy your recreational drug of choice, acid, coke, crack, heroin, meth, but are we still going to have doctors subcribe other serious medicine(drugs) or are we just going to put everything on the shelf, throw a HUGE sin tax on it and watch our SCUMBAG government and SCUMBAG corporations make big money off our society as it heads further into the toilet ?
Sorry people, dream and kick all you want but it aint never gonna happen. Decriminalization of weed is the best its going to get and we already have that in my State, have since the mid 70's. Its a limited amount but that is as it should be to keep people from selling it.
Am I supposed to take this seriously?You've gone from flatly denying that legalising a drug would be of any benefit to its users, to suggesting that people who buy hard drugs deserve to die, to simply "nuh-uh"-ing the idea that weed could ever become legal, despite the fact that California and Massachusetts both have bills in the works for it. This is just pathetic dude.
If you want to keep bull-headedly presuming the worst about every possible aspect of drug legalisation while offering no evidence for your outlandish claims, this argument is just useless, and I'm not going to waste my time. You're clearly wrapped up in your own narrow opinions and unable to comprehend the bigger picture here.
that WAS to the point, got a problem with it ? Express yourself, Im always up for some good entertainmentThat was so educated.
Good for you, so then your saying you are blind to the losers who got caught up in addictive drugs ?Brilliant strategy. Pretend you've been more exposed to the world of drugs than the rest of us. I grew up below the poverty line, surrounded by untermenchen.
So what ? The laws on murder, rape, theft, speeding, illegal parking havent changed a thing either... lets drop themThe law regarding drugs hasn't increased or decreased drug use.
What you "know" and what happens to the rest of the world are apparently completely different.
They had the choice. If you expect me to feel sorry for someone that made a choice to ruin their lives, you're god-damned insane.
EXACTLY THE POINT OF MY POSTS ON THIS TOPIC. Listen to the babies, "I want legal drugs. so I can do as I please" Always the pursuit of childrenThat's the problem with this world, people are too caught up in their childish emotions.
Naw, I wouldnt have a fucking clue about how this country wastes money on fuckwads, "so please, lets legalize drugs so they stop shooting each other"......And yes, let's waste prison space with druggies when there are murderers walking the streets. I wonder if you have any clue as to how much it costs just to imprison one person, I'd rather have that money used for people that actually deserve being locked away from society. And then we speed up death row, problem solved.
Im not caught up in anything, I would support a full military movement into the dregs of America and clean the house, problem solved, fear and death is the only detourant. Be kind of hard for a dead crackhead to breed baby crackheadsBut again, people get caught up in illogical emotional pleas and somehow the death penalty is inhumane or immoral.
read much ? This response has not one fucking thing to do with what that paragraph was aboutIf you expect me to sign a document to purchase something other than a house or a vehicle, you're out of your fucking mind.
And yet, the push for legalization grows everyday.
SHALLOW !To put legalizing pot smoking in the same sentence as gun and abortion issues is ridiculous.
SHALLOW !
It was a response to
"And yet, the push for legalization grows everyday."
and had nothing to do with degree and stems back further in the same conversation about
"The law regarding drugs hasn't increased or decreased drug use."
As well as the entire conversation
![]()
I responded to a few of your "points" in my last post, but so much of what you say is brainless and incoherent that it would be a waste of my time to go through all of it. I'm sure Meh already feels that you've wasted his time since your response to his last post was based entirely on "lol u dont know nothin bout drugs i been there on the streets, ur fancy books and statistics aint shit".
If you really give a shit about having an intelligent debate here, why don't you try defending just your one claim that legalising a drug makes a drug user WORSE off than if the drug were illegal. It's plainly obvious to even the simplest idiot that if pot were legal, people who smoke pot wouldn't have to worry about fines, prison, losing their job or their possessions, becoming stigmatised by society, and losing innumerable career opportunities. If you're really that oblivious to such simple facts, why would I waste my time arguing with you?
Man, your fucked up. Its simple
I know people that went to prison for 5 years or more for less than an ounce, so yes Im saying those stats are shit. Say they werent, what does it matter if some crack dealer goes down with 5grams ? 2nd offense possession of coke of any amount puts people away around here, big deal
I dont want the government in on drug deals, sorry. I'd rather be careful and not worry about it.
It will still be illegal to grow and thats what most people do and where most comes from to those that dont grow it. This creates a problem our government is not going to like. Get it? its a major flaw in the plan, so everyone will still be sneaking around unless silly enough to pay the price its going to be with "sin taxes"
It will be impossible for cops to determine if someone just smoked or did it 2 days ago, the stuff sticks like gum in the system but doesnt mean someone is high. Get it? this creates another flaw in the plan.
I know of NO incidences of anyone loosing their possesions over getting caught with a little weed. Those that have been busted bad had alot, again this is still going to be illegal for anyone having alot, like growers.
The only thing that needs to be done is "random drug testing in the work place" needs to stop because its discriminate against weed due to how weed sticks in the system like gum and other drugs and alcohol do not. But that has become a HUGE business, do you really think our government is going to put those people out of work ? Then do you think the corporations are not going to pressure the gov to continue to allow drug testing because straight people just dont want users around. Theres one test, you piss in a cup and it comes back positive or negative, it does not indicate what drug or what volumn or what time frame. From there we are going into blood tests and whos going to pay for that ? You... everytime some cop gets a dingle berry. This is not just some simple little thing... get it ?
Now hows abouts some "idiot" anwser my question about how we are going to control drugs ? Going from those that say it should all be legal because its no ones business. Sell them off a shelf ? Then what about perscription medicine when much of its lighter than hard recreational drugs, what ? Forget about doctors prescribing, just put it all on the shelves for grabs ? Yeah, Im sure they are ready to do that. What else, make doctors prescribe coke, crack, heroin, meth, acid ? Christ we just had someone crying about signing their name for cold medicine, you think they wont be having everyone sign for even weed ?
Now minors drink... ALOT, because its easy to get someone over 21 to buy it for them. Now you dont think they will be going nuts trying to chase down and bust the of age person thats handing out the mary jane cigarettes ?
The entire thing would be such a friggin mess and hardly worth it
Lastly, you are the one thats having the problem carrying on a intelligent conversation, flapping your mouth all pissy pants and making nothing but fairy tale blanket statements in your idea of a perfect world which simply does not exist.
It really isn't. To make laws about what someone can and can't do to themselves is bulllshit. Owning a gun falls under provision and/or self defense while pot pretty much should be treated as alchohol or nicotine. Not similar. Abortion involves ending a life so it isn't even remotely similar.
Why should it be anyone's business what I grow for my own personal use? Not to mention, if it was legal, most people who use would grow their own, so dealers would be cut out.
You really don't have any good arguement as to what the positive effects to society, or drug users specifically, would be for keeping it illegal, or how the current laws positively effect society.
Fenrisúlfr;8282287 said:A small reminder for the sake of argument. One does not argue with a cockroach, one crushes it. This poo-flinger brings nothing to the table and it would save us trouble to ignore him.