Alexi and however the Him guy is called have know each other for a while, so I highly doubt it was a copycat title, it just happened to come that way. And as you sure remember, Alexi's razorblade trouble is well documented, so since it's what you do you can go look into the deep meaning of it with this two things
As far as the interview goes, yes he did leave some good questions unanswered and that sorta pissed me off (why leave them there then? If there's not gonna be an answer just cut it), but he seemed pretty relaxed, easy going and I don't know, it felt like he's really into it (not the actual interview, the album).
What's wrong with the production on BD? :O I think it's fucking amazing. RRF is the only album that IMO has bad/weird production, the production really didn't fit their sound.
Where to begin? Too muddy, everything way too mashed up together and overall "crispness" of it. The reason I don't really listen to it anymore. It sort of works for the D songs (particularly SPFTD), but it's still too muddy, and then the Drop C songs get even messier. BD with HCD/RRF sound would've been twice as good. Mostly it's the guitars, but also it sounds like there's not enough separation between instruments.
Blooddrunk has shitloads better songwriting. Songs feel like songs, not like riffs randomly mashed together. Take ODYWC, totally wipes the table from all RRF in terms of songwriting. There's hits on that album. RRF has just some good parts but there's too much annoying material to enjoy them.
AYDY has some masterpieces but also some really shit songs. I wish they'd just included Living Dead Beat, Are You Dead Yet, Punch Me I Bleed, In Your Face, Trashed, Lost & Strungout and Knuckleduster, and perfected the sound of each six songs to create a masterful short album.
So let me get this straight:
-AYDY comes out and it's too generic, too american metal and overal shit for COB.
-BD comes out and much of the same, and AYDY is suddenly better.
-RRF comes out, it's great and sort of comeback to the old style (besides the aberration that was WIWI) for some months but now it's the dullest worst written album.
-New one is coming out (we haven't heard one snippet) and AYDY suddenly was actually pretty good (yet you're forgetting two of the best tracks in WNGF and NIL) and BD is not only better than RFF but has SHITLOADS of better songwriting? The former chuga chuga album now has shitloads of better songwriting? I'll agree ODYC, SPFTD and BFH have pretty good songwriting, but overall BD has the worst songwriting COB has done to date, testified by being represented by just 2 songs on the setlist once RRF came out (HCD and FTR still get an average of 4 and AYD 3), and more than half of RRF is 10 times better than anything on BD. And you got your goddamn melodies back, or are you going to tell me that NMF's second riff, most of SK, RTHAB and Ugly don't have some of the best keys and melodies COB has written for a while?
What?!? Production-wise with all of its mixing and mastering and instrument tones, RRF is one the best albums I've ever heard. It's on the same high level as HCDR whereas BD sounds too muddy with a band guitar tone and too much bass.Sure, it's your opinion but in reality, every music producer or sound engineer would tell you the same.
Blooddrunk is not a bad album but it's kinda boring. There is no single solo which I like and no song where I would say: awesome. Sure, it's definitely better than Something Wild, but it has no masterpiece songs like every other album has. And because of the bad production, I can't really listen to it. The only things I really like are BFH from beginning till the first solo, DWEDFN chorus, LB verse riff and RM verse riff but that's all.
This, exactly this. We don't need to go far at all, NMF's guitar tone whips the shit out of both BD and AYDY (except TL&S), and so does the solo to all in BD and many in AYDY. And the overall sound doesn't even begin to compare, you can clearly listen and enjoy every instrument in RRF, something very hard with BD (AYDY wasn't too bad except for the weirdly weak and low guitars).
Alexi says he likes ESP more than Jackson... well, he has to say it, and ESP was more 'nice' to him, but Jackson guitars are still better... it's like ESP copied the Randy Rhoads shape and only had to bulk it up unnatural to not get accused of plagiating.
Says who? Jackson treated him bad, and he remembers that, but besides that Jackon's been in steady decline for a while, current Jackson's aren't close to what they used to be. Yes, high end Jacksons are great (I myself own a mid-high range RR24 and I'm very pleased with it), but they're by no means ahead of ESP nowadays, and I really doubt his old RRs were better than his current ESPs. I've tried the AL600 series and they're great, so I can only imagine how his custom shop ones are. Oh, and Alexi's are not bulked up, nor are the CS and STD ones sold in Europe and Japan (for quite a bit more than the AL600 tho).
So I guess the guitarsound will sound like on Blooddrunk, or similar as he is using his marshalls in the studio this time around. Can't say I'm excited by that. Alexi has a really poor taste in guitar sound the last 10 years....
So basically you're saying Marshall sounds bad? Could you please elaborate with examples of music you may listen to that back up that point? I agree the mix in BD was fucked up, but to asume from there that Marshall usage means bad sound...
I never enjoyed the guitar sound of COB, just the composions. Maybe around Hatebreeder era they used delay which sounded cool in the leads. COB's guitar sound is nothing special, maybe they want their stuff to be more accessible for regular playing instead of being so dependant on equipment and setups.
Remember when I said a while ago that I thought you did play? I take it back, I should've read this before. This, plus the Jackson/ESP theory is a new level of nonsense.
Maybe it's something I've grown to perceive as the normal electric guitar sound.
First these bands are really ambitious (Something Wild), then they break through with records that are really creative, passionate and have enough experience to be magnificent, (Hatebreeder, Follow the Reaper), then they either sell out or just the flow of the deepest creativity gets obstructed and they end up making albums that are technical but not very sexy.
I don't know why I'm doing it, but I'll explain it to you once again: your "creative passionate atmosphere uberawesomeness" from the first albums is actually mostly power chord and keys backing melodies that probably came from playing around as Alexi keeps doing his solos, best exemplified by the inordinate amount of melody and lead variations Alexi used to do live on the old songs. The fact he doesn't do them today is not (at least solely) a byproduct of him not being arsed to do so or wanting to play the actual melodies live, but also of the backing track being more thoughtfully written and less loose to be improvised upon. Perfect example being KTS, masterpiece written in the studio because the album was too short. What's KTS mostly comprised of? Melodies and leads, yes.
I am not kidding you, I would really like to see what goes inside your mind when you make some of your associations, because half of the time you leave me baffled thinking how the fuck you get to the conclusions you get. Don't take it negative, freedom of mind and speech is great, but some of them are straight up from Mars.