Entropiastrife said:
what is the point of buying a cd in this era of mp3 players when you are just going to rip all of the tracks to your mp3 player anyway?
That makes no sense. When you buy a CD you buy a
license to listen to that music. Why does it matter how you then proceed to use that? I have around 475 CDs and I listen to them pretty much solely in mp3 form (because I find it more convenient and flexible and I also don't own a proper CD player anymore). Sure, my CDs are essentially collecting dust, but isn't that what
collections do in general? It's not like CDs are objects that you generally do anything with other than either sticking them in a CD player or leaving them on a shelf. I buy music because I love music and I have some uncontrollable urge to collect it. In my eyes my CD collection is not useless at all. I derive happiness simply from owning them, ocasionally taking one off the shelf and looking through the booklet while I listen. And just having the high quality source material and being able to re-rip it into whatever format I want whenever I want.
If you really feel like you don't need to buy any CDs at all simply because you can just download the music then in my opinion you're simply not a real music fan because that means you have at most a very superficial attachment to music.
And to properly reply to this topic (I wasn't going to but I already appear to be writing): I think music downloads only 'hurt' (I use the term loosely since the majority are already multi-millionaires) popular artists because they cater to a different audience. Take Britney Spears. Her target audience is not people who are passionate about music like myself and many others here. Her audience is 13-year-old spoiled teeny bopper girls with no real concept of musical taste who simply find her new single to be "just
so cool" and want to listen to it while they are gossiping with their girlfriends on MSN. So they download it, listen to it about 10 times, get bored of it due to the vapid and straightforwardness of the 'music' and move on to the next new hit song without ever buying a single CD because they have to spend all their allowance on Bacardi Breezers.
Ofcourse that's all a bit of an exageration, but in general I do think that is true. People who listen to pop music go for the easy thrills and never really get attached to the music simply because they aren't looking for that and because the music has so little substance that you couldn't get attached to it even if you tried. If you venture a bit deeper into the music scene that resides below the mainstream you just find a completely different type of music fan. People who do actually care about what they listen to and who do get attached to certain artists or albums. And those people generally don't just settle for a bunch of bad quality (I am convinced the average internet person has NO clue how to rip and encode CDs properly) poorly named files on their harddrive. They want the full package, sitting on their shelf collecting dust. And those same people are also likely to use filesharing services to discover new music that they could otherwise never have heard, and then proceed to buy that too, sometimes even at ridiculous prices.
Mainstream music does probably get hurt somewhat, but underground music profits from it more than anything. Since I personally could care less about most mainstream music in general, I am fine with it really. I certainly will never stop downloading, or buying CDs for that matter. No matter what happens to the music 'industry'.