I know so little about the inner workings of cars, that all of this means zero to me. As for the quality of the DSG transmission, it's also of little concern. Unless the car is breaking down with great frequency, it's not really a big deal. The car is under full warranty for the life of the lease and the dealership is three miles away.haha that article noted 2 tenths of a second as a significant difference. It also compared Ferraris to Audi/VW.
I'm no engineer but seems like it would make more sense to take the extra production expense of a DSG and apply it to making a more powerful engine.
Anyway, my friend's A3 DSG blew apart. Maybe he just had a bad one.
I know so little about the inner workings of cars, that all of this means zero to me. As for the quality of the DSG transmission, it's also of little concern. Unless the car is breaking down with great frequency, it's not really a big deal. The car is under full warranty for the life of the lease and the dealership is three miles away.
Zod
Looks like an Italianized Mazda3.
Zod
Agreed. It's an absurd comparison. Regardless, I'm really digging the car so far. Haven't really started to push it. Figured I'd wait till I hit the 1,000 mile mark first. Though, I've heard it said that the whole "break in period" for new cars is an old wive's tale or not.The article was demonstrating the inherent superiority of the DSG transmission in that it shifts faster than any other manual or autmomatic, including Ferrari. I just felt it was a bit humorous to be comparing the relatively slow gear change of a car with 500 horsepower to a fast shift of a 170 hp Audi/VW.