I denied that fanservice should affect how you make your next records, and I am still preaching that. There are 99 ways to please the fans, all of which I agree, but giving up your artistic integrity, because a few/a lot/many/everyone told you what they would like to hear on the next record is not one of them. No artist should ever give a flying fuck about that.
No one's argued that they should give up their artistic integrity, but instead to not give up high-quality music. Sounds Of A Playground was of much higher quality than Siren Charms.
If following the "trends" with R2R can be considered a sellout, you'd have to make up a new word for the phenomenon when you are working by the order of your listeners and fans. And this is what got on my nerves many times before, that some of you do not see it, even bring up examples of bands/artists who willingly licked ass on their records. That is, of course, not to say they can not be criticized. All I'm saying they shouldn't care if I want an SC 2 (I don't, I'd like something from R2R-STYE-CC era), or you want a Whoracle 2.
Stop using that mindless defense. Ignore those who say make a "blah blah part 2". None of us here are that fucking stupid. Again, it's about making quality music, record-to-record.
I also said that it is unlikely they would honor TJR with playing the album in its entirety. I would not oppose it, I mean ,why would I, but seeing how forsaken TJR songs even now... they either really-really-REALLY dislike them live now, or there is something special coming. We will know by the end of the year.
Who the fuck suggesed they play Jester Race in full live? Plus they've never played any Jester Race songs live in 15+ years except for Moonshield and Artifacts of the Black Rain occasionally.
I am, however, all for making tours like this one. I had the luck to attend NIN during a very similiar tour, and it was amazing. Yes, I missed out on some of the hits, but I got to see songs many people never had, and never will have the chance to hear live. It was also raw as fuck - almost zero visuals, just pure energy. Shows like this which really stick out for a fan.
Yes this particular set they're playing on this tour is a pleasant surprise, awesome for die-hard fans and then fans of the newer stuff still get to hear some of the constantly-played "hits" too. You could say that this is a reverse situation of how it's been the last few years. Except those that like the "hits" more get to hear more of them on this current show when people who wanted to hear a few more older songs weren't offered that luxury the last few years.
But you have to understand it just doesn't work on more "commercial" (there must be a better word for it) shows. I checked a random USA show from last year, it had 15 songs. I checked a random EU show (Barcelona!) and it had 19 with Resin. They perform 22 now + Jester's Door as an intro, so we can say it is 23 songs played. Not everyone is a die-hard IF fan, who listened to their whole discography 50 times at least. Many of these songs would do close to nothing for them, especially if you consider what you could play instead of them. "Woah dude, Square Nothing, yeah, I'm so fucking pumped! I'm so glad they got rid of Only For The Weak/Trigger/The Quiet Place for this!!" - honestly, how many people would say this on a regular show?
In Flames are still a heavy metal band, not a radio-rock band where people only know several songs of theirs. Metal is still a category of music that is only supported by a culture of people who have a deeper appreciation of bands and their work as opposed to more mainstream music. It's not as big of a deal or as far of a stretch as you think it is. But yes, this is a very off-color set they're playing now but it still fares well and in a lot of places is a killer show to most clubs full of IF fans.
I think it's safe to say, that just because I get a boner for Like You Better Dead, and you get a boner for Ordinary Story played live, many others would rather hear something else. I mean, seriously, up until Take This Life, there are 16 songs which people either did not even recognize, or just guess. "Ooh... it's the... mmm.... *chorus kicks in* oh yeah, Black and White, I think I remember it now!". (I'm obviously exaggerating, so save me the preach about Crawl Through Knives or other songs! You know what I meant)
I do know what you mean, but, look at how much they've played The Hive in the last 4-5 years. And the argument of Black and White doesn't work when they're playing Drifter this year... What IF fan that ONLY likes the "hits" knows a filler track like Drifter? You also could easily swap Drifter with Black and White or Minus since they're all pretty much equal energy songs from Reroute.
I did agree that regular shows could and should get a more fair representation of songs, and I believe their 2015 shows were a step closer to the optimal setlist. I, however, strongly opposed to forcing them to play 3-4 pre-2000 songs, if not only they believe they doesn't sound as good as other songs would, but even the people there would react negatively to them. And it's not me you have to convince that Ordinary Story, Jotun and Food For The Gods should all be staples, because I'd listen to everything post LS. It's the other (on average) few thousand individuals (which, by the end of the year, makes up an average tens of thousands). I simply do not think setlists like this would sell. And if you look around at other major bands or artists, I believe almost every single one of them are following this principle. Some gets more loose than the regular IF setlist and include more older songs, but some are even more strict and playing the same exact fucking songs for years with very very little variety.
We haven't been saying they HAVE to play a couple Colony songs and a few Clayman songs EVERY show... But fuck, after 10 years of barely touching them... give them some love that they deserve. That's all it ever was.