I haven't seen Garden State but I'd prefer it over Titanic just for the fact that it is half the length of that. So at worst it will be just as bad as Titanic, but it'll be over much more quickly. Sounds good to me.
Even James Cameron admitted that Titanic was basically a very expensive chick flick. What confuses me more than anything is why a man who is obviously so fascinated by the ocean and the various disasters that happened on it (see his various documentaries which unlike Titanic are actually interesting and possible to watch without fucking falling asleep) would make a movie that focuses mostly on an incredibly trite love story and completely wastes the potential of making an actually interesting account of what happened (or what might have happened) to the Titanic and the people on it.
Seriously, you can watch two movies that are actually good in the time it takes to sit through one viewing of Titanic. It's a fucking waste of time and a waste of a good director's talent.
Even James Cameron admitted that Titanic was basically a very expensive chick flick. What confuses me more than anything is why a man who is obviously so fascinated by the ocean and the various disasters that happened on it (see his various documentaries which unlike Titanic are actually interesting and possible to watch without fucking falling asleep) would make a movie that focuses mostly on an incredibly trite love story and completely wastes the potential of making an actually interesting account of what happened (or what might have happened) to the Titanic and the people on it.
Seriously, you can watch two movies that are actually good in the time it takes to sit through one viewing of Titanic. It's a fucking waste of time and a waste of a good director's talent.