Originally posted by Static
I am a fellow Radiohead fanatic to you MA, but your behaviour in this thread and attitude towards Tool is disgusting. It would not be so wrong if your view was subjective, and you said 'I don't like Tool because of this and this and this'.
And the Tool fans are subjective little Angels aren't they? Oh wait, no they aren't. Maybe if they paid any respect to other people's opinions I'd do the same to them but hell, most of them are as pretentious and arrogant as the band they masturbate to everynight.
I can't stand Radiohead's singer so any negative comments about Maynard's vocals make me laugh my ass off. That whiny guy can't compare to Maynard... his vocals are nowhere near as powerful or captivating.
There is a prime example, why should I even bother respecting these people at all..
Instead your view is covered in ignorant comments, your whole view seems based on how Tool compares to Radiohead and this is idiotic to say the least
I USED RADIOHEAD AS AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE MY POINT THAT TOOL ARE NOT PROGRESSIVE THEN SOME GUY STARTS SHITTING ON THEIR MUSIC, OH OKAY THERE BUD I'LL JUST IGNORE THAT BECAUSE REPLYING MAKES ME IGNORANT AND IDIOTIC. Jesus fuck, and everyone here calls
me ignorant? How about you people start reading some of my fucking posts with the heavy "Tool-bias" oh jesus, what's the point I've been down this road so many times with you fanboys..
This is how it seems to me, and yet, what the fuck warrants a comparison of either of these groups? My god...they are so different as to make a comparison laughable. And basing your opinion of Tool, and treating others opinions in a scornful way because you are sick of people calling Tool 'progressive', when you think Radiohead is much more so, is also pretty close-minded. You must try to base Tool on its own merits.
I'm close-minded because I think Radiohead are more progressive than Tool? Oh, lord Static I can only wish to be as open-minded as you to other people's opinions!
Once again,
I DON'T DISLIKE TOOL, my only point has ever been that they are not progressive, they re-use the same ideas over and over and their sound has barely changed over 3 albums. Just because I think Lateralus was a crap album, and if it had been done by anyone else you'd all ignore it doesn't mean I don't like Tool.
Also...Sober and Schism being similar in anyway is absolutely laughable. For starters they have different time signatures...and that massive mid-section of Schism...how the fuck does that bare any resemblence to anything in sober!? Sober is much more normally structured with chorus/verse a lot more, whereas Schism goes on this huge tangent at the end into this entirely new part. Are you on drugs!? I don't get this....
SOBER: Slow build-up into the intro, repetitive basic riff and wailing guitar supports it, Maynard joins in the fun with his montone vocals he becomes loud as it approaches the chorus as does the riffs and drums yada yada..there is a really slow part where he sings quietly and the wailing guitar goes but then it bursts into life..and then continues in the usual manner till the end where he repeats the same vocals over and over till it finishes.
SCHISM: Another slow build-up, the repetitive basic riff begins and is joined by another guitar again, Maynard joins in with some vocals that again get loud at set periods along with the music, then the song goes all quiet again and his vocals became more quieter and somber during it..then it bursts into life and he will continue this until the end..where he repeats the same vocals over and over till it finishes.
So yeah, I'm on drugs.