Adventureland was pretty great, although it would have been better if it was filmed eight years ago and cast Jake Gyllenhaal and Jena Malone as the leads. (Kristen Stewart and Jena Malone are about as similar looking as any two actresses. Except one can act.) Also the parallels to The 40 Year Old Virgin hurt the originality of it. Would have liked a more ambiguous ending too, but that's nitpicking. It ruled. I suppose I wouldn't relate to a movie set in this year much more than a movie set in the '87, so the era didn't really factor into my opinion. Although there's not really any song today as funny as 'Amadeus, Amadeus'.
Also saw Gummo recently. Terrible. I don't think you can do a faux-documentary without making it ironic. Then again, it was probably too incoherent to call a faux-documentary. I don't doubt that a less lazy filmmaker could have made a great movie about a similar topic if they had done some work and hit the streets of some shit town. And it could have maybe even had a story arc, or character development, or you know, characteristics of movies. Even as an anti-movie, I think it fails horribly to convey a sense or realism, and without that, there's no reason to care about such flat characters. From my perspective, the world generated was too bogus to generate the suspension of disbelief I needed for this. It was more about a filmmaker trying to move people by using pure imagery rather than substantive storytelling tools. I found it to be a complete failure.