i watched it today. some thoughts (i'm not spoiling any plot twists here but don't read if you want to go in totally blind):
- it's not a BLADE RUNNER movie, or at least not in the ways that made me love BLADE RUNNER, but it's a deliberate subversion and i think that's the best way of approaching these kinds of projects. i mean, if i want to watch something like the original i can just watch the original. i have a suspicion that this relates to the original BLADE RUNNER in a similar way to how the new twin peaks supposedly relates to the originals (despite not having seen that yet), and is best approached on its own terms rather than hoping it'll reinvoke the same feelings.
- forget about rainy melancholy and lived-in, gorgeously designed ground-level clutter - that's all gone. this is far more austere and oppressive, full of quiet, empty spaces. it's one of the most aggressively stylised blockbusters ever, immaculate to the point of feeling antiseptic (aside from the occasional, super horrifying glitches - i loved the glitches), full of striking images (it's very much a villeneuve movie, and roger deakins is at his legendary best) but short on humanity - which is both thematically coherent and emotionally alienating. roy batty is long dead, he'd be laughably out of place in this world, and i think that's the point, one worth musing on (probably moreso than musing on 'is he/she/it a replicant', a conversation i always found pretty exhausting - the movie agrees, mostly?).
- there's no real mystery or puzzle to this. it's more like an abstract thesis about the original film, very self-conscious and analytical (not a coincidence that there's a reference to nabokov's PALE FIRE), maybe too neatly expository ultimately. which is the opposite of the original, a movie so maddeningly, intoxicatingly open-ended it continues to be debated to this day.
- the literary progenitor this time isn't dick or orwell but kafka. there are references galore, starting with the name(s) of the main character.
- harrison ford stopped acting a long time ago. jared leto needs to stop being a thing. gosling should keep doing movies like this and DRIVE because he's made for them, and not much else.
- the score seems stuck between vangelis and zimmer, it was pretty cool but also felt a little lazy to me.
- many of the most interesting characters here are women, and yet they all seem like missed opportunities - especially luv, who starts out seeming complex and relevant to the point where her devolution into villainous archetype sort of baffled and distracted me, but i may have missed something there.