The thread where you talk about non-metal music you like.

Man, I haven't had this debate in ages.

I should disclose that I prefer a Spotify subscription over buying albums, so that may influence my view of an album's quality. Anyway, I definitely consider an album with a few great songs and a few bad songs of higher quality than an album full of average songs that are all "consistent" with each other. If a song sounds like (or reminds me of) a hundred other songs, it loses meaning for me.
 
Last edited:
Filler? I disagree, from what I remember they were quite consistent, care to post an example of a filler track?

i like the stuff that's more poignant/mysterious/evocative/atmospheric/whatever the fuck, pure trad folk doesn't typically interest me, like happy irish jigs n shit.

i think you're conflating consistency and homogeneity, zabu. people tend to use 'consistent' as a purely qualitative term, not to mean sameyness. i've had this conversation with someone else though, he said albums need peaks and troughs or some shit. i don't agree at all but each to their own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
salviatek-003.jpg


Superficie - Helices

Percussion based electronic music from Brazil.
 
Who doesn't? Aside from those undeserving of life itself?
Well, there are those who are so intellectually dishonest and/or bankrupt that they feel that they should convince people of how much Coverdale ruins the album, no matter how unbelievably moronic that statement sounds.
 
Yeah, so I've heard from the hardest of hardcore Mark 2 fanfucks. He ruins the album by delivering one of the best studio vocal performances in rock history while simultaneously not being Ian Gillan is what I've gathered from them.
I'd argue that he has more versatility than Gillan.