The "What Are You Doing This Moment" Thread

One problem among many, to be sure. Reading this, he sounds like a real sleazeball, and that so many people are saying living under him reminds them of living under communism is surely quite damning. I laughed that somebody said (paraphrasing) "he's not even Czech, he's a Slovakian gangster and they were glad to get rid of him, it's like he hijacked the country and we're the hostages."

I just thought it was interesting that one of the main charges against him was related to EU subsidies.
 
So last night I was sitting around with two of my corridormates, a French guy and a Slovakian girl, discussing spirituality. The French guy related his experiences of successful seances and of being contacted by a deceased friend. The Slovakian girl told me about some wise woman she knew in Prague who could help you with your personal problems, using methods like automatic writing to divine truths about you. I told her that sounds like psychoanalysis to me, but she assured me that it was a mystical practice, that this wise woman formed a spiritual connection and conveyed "messages from the universe". She also made several references to an entity she called "the being".

I told them I didn't rule out the existence of spirits, but that I also could not believe it unless I myself had a spiritual experience. So naturally we held a seance. We contacted a spirit that identified itself as "YTES", but this didn't make sense to us so we asked its name again and it spelled out "VOYOYON". At some point we deduce through yes-or-no questions that the spirit has a message for me specifically, and it tells me "TFUFUKW" before fucking off back to the spirit realm. Maybe our spiritual connection was disrupted by that "they're taking the hobbits to Isengard" song blaring from some outdoor party nearby. Anyway I guess spirits exist and they're fucking retarded.
 
Every time I see CiG's avatar in the little thread-embedded-icon thing I think it's the backside of a Yu-Gi-Oh card.
 
220px-Yugioh_Card_Back.jpg


I actually think it is.
 
About to try making eggs Benedict for the first time. I'm cheating with the hollandaise sauce and using a powder, but poaching the eggs alone should prove challenging, I've never succeeded.
 
Shutting down my PC because the whole building my apartment's in is getting major repairs and I have to put furniture & appliances in storage and move out for 5 months. Moving back with my parents. A 623km drive away and a chance to see lots of live shows in a different city for a change.
 
Getting files together for a copyright registration. Been working on a novel in my spare time, still a long way from publication but close to 100 pages in. I want to register an unpublished draft now, cause I've been sharing parts of it with friends/acquaintances for feedback, and my giant ego makes me paranoid of plagiarism.

It's starting to sink in how much I'll be baring my soul to the world when I publish this. Hard to decide whether I want to publish anonymously or not. On one hand I value my privacy a lot, but on the other hand the anonymity probably wouldn't last, and on the minuscule chance the book is a success I'd probably prefer to get recognized for it.
 
Copyright is a given on all created works. If you are that paranoid forget the cost of copyright put the file on a USB stick and mail it to yourself, keep the package unopened with the date stamp on it. It's hard proof of when the file was created because the metadata shows when the actual file was first created.

As for anonymity even if you do make a successful book, having a pseudonym is no draw back if you don't want your full name out there. Plenty of authors, known and unknown use pseudonyms, many readers don't even realise it. If you do use one and the book is successful it can be reprinted with your full name.
 
Copyright is a given on all created works. If you are that paranoid forget the cost of copyright put the file on a USB stick and mail it to yourself, keep the package unopened with the date stamp on it. It's hard proof of when the file was created because the metadata shows when the actual file was first created.

https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html

"Registration is recommended for a number of reasons. Many choose to register their works because they wish to have the facts of their copyright on the public record and have a certificate of registration. Registered works may be eligible for statutory damages and attorney's fees in successful litigation. Finally, if registration occurs within five years of publication, it is considered prima facie evidence in a court of law."

Poor man's copyright doesn't come with those benefits.

As for anonymity even if you do make a successful book, having a pseudonym is no draw back if you don't want your full name out there. Plenty of authors, known and unknown use pseudonyms, many readers don't even realise it. If you do use one and the book is successful it can be reprinted with your full name.
I guess... just a question of how long it would take to get it re-registered/reprinted (registration alone can take like half a year), and whether people who read the original would bother to look up the new edition.
 
Yeah I've been through all that for 30+ years. I've registered copyrights, I've registered trademarks and sure they do protect you but copyright is still a given and if you can prove it's your work there isn't anyone in the world that can take that from you.

You also have to take into account that you can't copyright an idea, so the plot of the book is almost impossible to protect, it's the words you protect, therefore copyrighting a partially finished book could see the author only partially protected. Also as a first book it's not going to be great and therefore more than likely not going to have a line of people willing to steal it. And there is already a thousand books out there that use a similar premise, similar plot and are already published, trust me they are out there even for the most obscure genre.

Poor man's copyright may not come with the benefits but in the real world the chances of your work being stolen are pretty damn slim.

Writing under a pseudonym and revealing the real authors name can happen in many ways. It could be as simple as a byline on a cover, it could be so much more. But before any author worries about the name on the cover they need to write the book, edit it, send it to beta readers, edit it again, pay for a line edit, re-read it, pay for a full edit, and then start shipping it to agents if they want traditional publishing. The truth of the world is only a very very very small number of fist time authors get picked up and it's a long process. The publishers wont even give a crap if you call yourself Uncle Fairynuts on the manuscript, if they like it they will give you the pros and cons of choosing names for publication when they offer a contract.

On the self pub route of course it's all different, you buy an ISBN throw the shit on Amazon because you've read it three times and think you can edit it your own work and then another half arsed novel gets released on the world. But the advantage is you can change whatever you like when you like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zabu of nΩd
I guess... just a question of how long it would take to get it re-registered/reprinted (registration alone can take like half a year), and whether people who read the original would bother to look up the new edition.

I think it's awesome you're working on this. For what it's worth, literary recognition is a fickle thing. Basically, if you write an immensely popular book under a pseudonym, it will become obvious almost immediately that the name isn't a real person. If you don't do book tours or let journalists photograph you, people will realize. At that point, if the demand is there and you're comfortable divulging the info, then those who want to know your name will know it. The only way to stay anonymous after writing a popular book is to really, really try.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zabu of nΩd