F**ing God, now I know that you're really jocking.
Edit: are you really 22 or just trying to look mature?
That's a reply to someone else, I did not joke in my reply to you.
I can prove it, here:
Suburban Me (it is a song from Clayman, I swear):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqyypB4YNHA
Only For The Weak (3rd most played song ever, and the song that caught my attention and most of the people I know had the same experience, whether they usually listen to metal or disco. It is also on Clayman, I'm not lying) :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqyypB4YNHA
Swim (is this song from STYE/R2R?? Almost, though credits where its' due, musically it's more like old IF, but the screaming vocals which will dominate the next records had appeared. This is on Clayman too by the way):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5K6A_PGdyQ
Satellites And Astronatus (Evil In A Closet demo tape, continue on Square Nothing)
Brush The Dust Away (That fucking solo [which rocks] saves it from being called an R2R demo song from start to finish, but those vocals and especially the clean (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) mumbling vox is totally what will be returning a lot on the new IF.)
Square Nothing (You remember that song on TJR/Whoracle/Colony where half of the song was a slow accoustic piece with Anders doing delicate vocals on top of it? Me neither, but this is already the second song like this on Clayman, and they gladly re-used this style on later records, obviously more perfected and much more streamlined. I love the fact that Pallar Anders Visa on Colony was basically putting one toe into the cold water, than came Clayman putting both feets in and with R2R they swam deep into it. Difference is, on Colony you could defend the song being a 1,5min acoustic jam, but on Clayman it's pretty hard to explain why Anders doing weird ass vocals compared to their earlier materials and why these songs last 4-5 mins)
So, you see, the only "real" new IF songs from start to finish might be OFTW and Suburban Me, but the vocals are training grounds for the future on almost every song. It's like a collection of earlier songs which had something strange going for them (Jotun had the mumbling for example in 1997). And thank god they did not continue the Coerced Coexistence--->Clayman (song) route in terms of choruses and singing style. Really annoyes me and feels out of place, not to mention it has to suck live.
Clayman is just as old IF as it is the new, but no one bothers with thinking it over, because R2R was like the biggest wtf moment ever, where they not only put +10 to every weird shit they collected on Clayman they had to layer it to death, so it could became such a controversial record. They even made a decent artwork to differentiate it from Clayman, which was made by a guy who just read the tutorial for photoshop and a child who was told to draw something that resembles fire and he was told "close enough son, but it will do".
My biggest pet peeve is how much is going on on that artwork (presented "in-your-face" style), without having any artistic value. Yes, flames, jesterhead and that sign, wow, DEEP. Not sure why they stopped there, they could include the all seeing eye, a pentagram and the CIA logo.
Look at Whoracle. I love the concept, both the artwork and both how they came up with the word. If you put your mind to it, you can envision a cool story.
I'm just talking about the F***ng song dude. But you know what? I apologize. This song is obviously californian death metal, so I will forget about Korn influence into Anders lines, and I will forget about the downtuned guitars at the end section of the chorus, and I will forget about Korn and Slipknot being labeled as Nu Metal, because they're obviously not.
Korn was nu metal as fuck, while Slipknot was nu metal as well on their debut album. Sure, you can throw a lot more genre at Slipknot, but nu metal is definetly one of them.