PrincessHades
Active Member
- Apr 11, 2015
- 3,032
- 1,435
- 113
Weed or the opioid? Verify any pharmaceuticals you purchase via Google. Its really easy to identify pills by description and markings. If they are pills, what markings did you get?
Weed or the opioid? Verify any pharmaceuticals you purchase via Google. Its really easy to identify pills by description and markings. If they are pills, what markings did you get?
stop the concerned father routine and let iron wizard kill himself in peace. this is america.
How many pills did you get, only two? Snorting them is not only useless (you will lose more of it than you want, and get less high tbh), but also painful with the binders and acetominophen. Not worth it at all. You are best off either just swallowing the pills, or if you must crush them, put it in a non-scented tissue, and eating it (never cared for doing this myself). You could put it into gatorade as you suggest, but they are kind of bitter. I usually just broke up the pills into a few pieces and swallowed them. I would do both pills at once, taking only one will just be a tease. Don't take them too late at night. You will probably lose sleep if you take them past 8-9PM. You are safe with acetominophen doses of up to 1000mg (the dose I usually take when I have a sore throat). 15mg of hydrocodone should be a decent first time high with no tolerance. Expect 4 to 6 hours of high once it kicks in.
aight heres what im gonna do. im gonna sleep from now till like 11 and wake up, take the pills, then stay awake till 3 or 4
I think you are taking these far leftist articles too seriously
most people are pretty happy with Chappelle's more recent stuff.
Not really sure what this even means. How seriously should I take the majority of professional critics? It's not like I'm thinking about it all day and writing counter-articles or something, just one comment in the forums.
Also not even sure you can handwave these critics as "far leftist" because for example you have people like this guy writing about Chappelle's latest special in the WSJ and he's not some kind of hysterical progressive, he's an older black man who writes from a totally different perspective. He writes about how the actions of Dems will give Trump a second term, he writes about assimilation of immigrants, and other things.
One of his main critiques is that Chappelle over-uses the N-word lol no blue hair would dream of telling a black man he can't use that word anymore.
Based on what? I'd say opinion on his latest special is pretty split.
The professionals are shitting on him for not being woke enough, and the general public seem split between it was funny and yawn it was the same old shit.
I meant that I think that you shouldn't judge public perception based on a handful of negative articles. Like I said, everywhere I look I see really positive feedback. All good comics have their naysayers; not everybody is going to like it.
Taking comedy critique from WSJ is problem number one. Problem two, I don't really care about some old guy's opinion on comedy. Chapelle is a comedian with more appeal to us 90s kids than some old guy who writes for the WSJ. Dave does kind of over-use the N-word though, so I do agree with him on that (it doesnt ruin it for me at all though, that's just how Dave is).