Next Opeth Album

Never took anything as personnal offenses to your criticisms, not even to your pitiful insults. Matter of fact : what you said had to be interpreted the way I and Samsara did. But I just think you realized how stupid you were, because what you said was clearly that your opinions were facts, somehow.

"i know i've seen others express this belief many times on this forum, and if you'd like the proof, pull out a pair of headphones and listen to a watershed song yourself."

...is exactly what you said, and shows are wrong you are.

"to prevent certain people from totally misinterpreting my post (the usual), im going to put this in bold: there is no problem with a band changing direction with every album, as long as it is done with taste."

...which makes it even more ironic... and saying "as long as it is done with taste" is just ridiculous. (EDIT : Funny, the e-mail I received contains less insults, so you edited just to look more bad.)

ok but thatz just your opinion ~*~
 
should there be new instruments added to the next Opeth album like violins, horns, harps, banjo, timpani drums, panflute, etc....?

I say this because one thing I like about Watershed is the Oboe, it has a sad sorrowful sound that complimented the guitar parts nicely, and added to the gloomy atmosphere of Watershed.
 
What I agree on:
Mike seems to be going in a more prog direction, which lots of times is having something different just for the sake of being different and weird. By doing that, I don't feel the emotion that came out of the earlier music. It seems like the music is now aimed at the mind, when it used to be to the heart (soul, whatever). So, while the album sounds great and has a lot of unique ideas, the music doesn't connect like it used to. A lot of it is like "hmmm, thats a nice idea" as opposed "OMG I'M CUMMING!!!!"
I agree with you there.
BWP was the last album I found really overwhelming. Each song had something totally unique: the solos of Leper Affinity, the chorus in Bleak, the epicness and climax of Drapery Falls, the depressive beauty(?) of Dirge, the drive and the solos of Funeral Portrait and finally the brutality of Blackwater Park (especially the last 3 minutes, omg).
GR and WS, on the other hand, are damn good albums, but I justdon't get that genius feel from them.
 
I agree with you there.
BWP was the last album I found really overwhelming. Each song had something totally unique: the solos of Leper Affinity, the chorus in Bleak, the epicness and climax of Drapery Falls, the depressive beauty(?) of Dirge, the drive and the solos of Funeral Portrait and finally the brutality of Blackwater Park (especially the last 3 minutes, omg).
GR and WS, on the other hand, are damn good albums, but I justdon't get that genius feel from them.

I can't agree on this one. I find the latest two albums a lot more interesting (alongside SL) than Blackwater Park. I'm not saying it wouldn't have been an overwhelming experience when I first heard it, but in retrospect some of the riffing is a bit too repetitive and the songs are relatively simple, even boring (Bleak, The Funeral Portrait). The music has more interesting elements nowadays.
 
yeah the leper affinity is an awesome song. but i can also play the whole thing, and i dont fin dit particularly unique, its a very good representation of opeth. its full of usual chord progressions, couple of cool licks, solo, epic bit, soft bit, repeats riffs from the beginning, then an ending. pretty much your standard opeth song in terms of construction
 
I find just as much uniqueness in Watershed and Ghost Reveries songs as in Blackwater Park songs (though I will admit that GR and then WS rank slightly under BWP and SL for me)

Some examples..
Baying of the Hounds and The Lotus Eater come out right off the bat with really fast and high quality vocals

Harlequin Forest (in addition to my absolute favorite growling bits) along with The Lotus Eater put clean vocals over distortion guitars in ways other albums never did

Heir Apparent and The Grand Conjuration aren't quite the same quality imo but have the same really heavy feel of songs off BWP and D1

Beneath the Mire has great solo'ing (though I think The Leper Affinity's is my personal fav)

The riffs after Hessian Peel's solo remind me of some fast single-note-centered riffs like on Master's Apprentices and Serenity Painted Death

Ghost of Perdition covers so many individual styles in one song that its like something off their first 2 albums but with better production and transitioning (and of course the deeper growls).

And Coil and Isolation Years and Hours of Wealth...just beautiful



So, ya, as you can see, I love their older stuff, but imo there's plenty unique moments in the newer stuff.
 
Not sure if offtopic but...

I think they've been musically "degenerating" all the way since Orchid, if you notice, Every album is more and more simple, It took about 10 listens to get to Orchid, about 2-5 to get to Morningrise, not sure about MAYH I just got it, SL took about 4 listens, BWP took like 3, Deliverance took 1-2 (I don't count Damnation now, it's not a prog album), GR then did took about 3-6 listens but it's because it was my first opeth album.

It doesn't sound THAT bad, except that Watershed was instant hit with the first listen.

I hope that in the future they again keep on making more +10min songs instead of more short songs like in Watershed.
 
Not sure if offtopic but...

I think they've been musically "degenerating" all the way since Orchid, if you notice, Every album is more and more simple, It took about 10 listens to get to Orchid, about 2-5 to get to Morningrise, not sure about MAYH I just got it, SL took about 4 listens, BWP took like 3, Deliverance took 1-2 (I don't count Damnation now, it's not a prog album), GR then did took about 3-6 listens but it's because it was my first opeth album.

It doesn't sound THAT bad, except that Watershed was instant hit with the first listen.

I hope that in the future they again keep on making more +10min songs instead of more short songs like in Watershed.

i dont want to get into an arguement but this is the most retarded post ive seen in a very long time
 
i dont want to get into an arguement but this is the most retarded post ive seen in a very long time

Thank you, whateverway I am a noob anyway. :lol:

(Though I'm one of those people who think that Orchid is their best album, musically.)

Edit: actually, I'm wearing orchid longsleeve atm.
 
Not sure if offtopic but...

I think they've been musically "degenerating" all the way since Orchid, if you notice, Every album is more and more simple, It took about 10 listens to get to Orchid, about 2-5 to get to Morningrise, not sure about MAYH I just got it, SL took about 4 listens, BWP took like 3, Deliverance took 1-2 (I don't count Damnation now, it's not a prog album), GR then did took about 3-6 listens but it's because it was my first opeth album.

It doesn't sound THAT bad, except that Watershed was instant hit with the first listen.

I hope that in the future they again keep on making more +10min songs instead of more short songs like in Watershed.

hmm, with listening to Watershed I actually started missing some extra subtleties and complexities in older albums ...
Their composing capabilities have become stronger on every album. They write much more coherent songs now. You mistake randomness and collage of riffs with composition.
I love the first 2 albums as well, and I understand completely what people mean when they say those had much more atmosphere. But it's a huge mistake to act as if that was their creative peak and it went downhill, or that things became more accessible. That's simply because the compositions are much more coherent, which in turn is much more difficult to achieve.

If anything, we might say that the brilliance of Opeth on the first 2 albums was to cover up shortcomings in compositional skills by creating intense atmosphere and making it sound as if it's intended to be so "chaotic", as if it's a story being told.
This all makes it kind of pointless to compare different stages in Opeth's career. Watershed is as brilliant an album as the rest of them, all in their own way.
 
Not sure if offtopic but...

I think they've been musically "degenerating" all the way since Orchid, if you notice, Every album is more and more simple, It took about 10 listens to get to Orchid, about 2-5 to get to Morningrise, not sure about MAYH I just got it, SL took about 4 listens, BWP took like 3, Deliverance took 1-2 (I don't count Damnation now, it's not a prog album), GR then did took about 3-6 listens but it's because it was my first opeth album.

It doesn't sound THAT bad, except that Watershed was instant hit with the first listen.

I hope that in the future they again keep on making more +10min songs instead of more short songs like in Watershed.

First 2 albums are not more complex ... in any way at all really. Long does not mean complex. I love the first 2 albums, but Opeth have become soooo much more than that since then. BRI is pretty much my least favourite song - purely because it sounds like it was written to be long and is incredably incoherent; quite often on there's just a random drum fill into a completely new section. Thats not a problem really with albums since. - Mike's songwriting has matured massively.
 
Thank you, whateverway I am a noob anyway. :lol:

(Though I'm one of those people who think that Orchid is their best album, musically.)

Edit: actually, I'm wearing orchid longsleeve atm.

The first time I listened to Orchid I fell asleep. Same goes for Morningrise.
MAYH was the first album they did which I found any good.
Watershed might be their best.