no country for old wainds
Active Member
- Nov 23, 2002
- 26,753
- 9,714
- 113
i'd like to petition for the phrase coonygook mcgollywog to be removed from the banlist.
And report is a way to bring attention
2 words (maybe a couple more variations, not sure).
I don't take many (if any) things personally, I think what happens is that people take what I say personally because I tend to have no filter and come across as an asshole. Anyways it's irrelevant imo.
Though I wouldn't personally ban that word (interesting that "nigga" isn't banned though from what I can tell) but I didn't make an issue over it because it was already banned when I joined, so why bother. But now that this new word is banned I think it's just revealing a pattern that will potentially expand and it all depends on something as arbitrary as how many people can get butthurt at one time enough to mass-report and spur Deron into action, I think that's fucking ridiculous.
If that were the case, he could have stated that from the start. But instead his justification for the bans have been entirely down to reports. Could be so, but to use that as the justification at this point would be very opportunistic imo.
What do you mean? I'm not trying to pass an American constitutional-style law on his website, I'm arguing for freedom of speech as a principle. I think it would be best to err on the side of a total free use of words and people who get offended by words can use their own speech to debate it or just use the block function.
There is or isn't freedom of speech on a privately owned message board depending on what the owner wants to do. Are you saying I shouldn't at least be allowed to try to sway his opinion on how to run things? Are you really that much of a God damn sycophant dude?
Okay? So some shitty quality conversations can exist, I really don't see how that's a threat to anything or anybody.
Yeah I'm probably left of Deron, again so what? I don't see how any of this is relevant.
I seem to remember Deron indicating that he's lost advertising revenue from people saying the N word and that's probably why he asked for it to stop initially
It is indeed an interesting conversation, and I am always perplexed at the social aspect of people who treat the Internet different than they would in real life. Not different necessarily, than if you were with a bunch of friends in a private setting, but in general as in out in public, a workplace, at a concert with tons of people you do not know, shopping, sitting at a table in a restaurant - I just don't see you all using these words as part of your normal vocabulary in general conversation (in a public setting).
But in the very end, for me, if you really step back and think about the accepted definition of the words - the N word is a derogatory word for an African American. The F word is a derogatory word for a gay male. Their core meaning is hateful, bullying, and meant to cause the most verbal harm if you're black and/or a gay male.
You called me emotional a few pages ago, but I remember when this topic first came up you and a few others stated you would leave. I don't see how that's NOT taking it personal.
I guess, I just don't care enough to even be worried about this. The way the board is, where the majority of the users have been here for more than a decade, I doubt it'll change drastically.
Again, I've never even spoken a word to or about Deron before today. So how would I be a sycophant? You've done that more here, than I've ever done. I'm just seeing what's right. I know you think I care about the N word but I don't. The people who used it here are either extremely crazy or like have other issues that's beyond racism. And tbh, this isn't the first time this conversation has come up and if I already know how you and a few others feel about censored words, then he knows too. It's two words. One of which is already in the coding. Opinions were expressed before, and decisions were already made. Not being able to use a word on a privately owned forum isn't a dealbreaker for me. I come here for music, movies and the occasional discussion. Nudes still posted, stories of buttholes from all over the world are still shared, and all the other charming HBB stories are still shared. It's not a huge deal at all.
It's relevant because I'm trying to prove to you a decision to not have two words used isn't some leftist takeover of safe spaces.This board is attached to a name - an actual person.
ALL insults are hateful and bullying at their core so all you've done here is make the case that all hateful and bullying words should be censored. That you only censor two specific words only speaks to a favouritism of hurt feelings. Why not just ban all hateful words? My thinking essentially is that you might ban other hurtful words, granted there is enough offense on the part of users behind it.
The core of my argument is that the list of banned words is on an expansive trend. How does that fall into anything you've just said?
Also, to calling people names, Deron actually started it by calling certain people babies and as an aside, the report function is the literal definition of suggesting the owner of the website do something he may or may not want to do.
Edit: what makes you a sycophant? Well one example would be that you admit you don't care about this particular subject yet here you are defending the single person in the position of power on this website as if you do.
You are correct, but generally they are opinions of a person such as asshole, cunt, fuckwad, dipshit, shit stain...
Being black is not a choice - you just are.
Being gay is not a choice (in my opinion) - you just are.
The words banned attack something about people they can not change by choice, and therefore to me are of no use around here, especially when overused.
Maybe there will be other words in the future? I'm not Censordamus, so I'm not sure. I've seen nothing to add to my radar at this time.
Let's examine some key points here that are indisputable.
Again, you are being a [banned word] if you expect me to take you or your claims that I'm sucking up to Deron seriously.
- You are using the hypothetical argument about this being a slippery slope as one of the main elements of your argument, as I said.
- Without evidence, you are claiming that Deron changes rules based only on the report function rather than his own personal desires as one of the main justifications for why it is wrong. This is called an assumption.
- I stated that this is Deron's website and that he can do what he wants here regardless of whether or not I agree with it. This is not a defense of Deron. It's just a true statement.
I haven't once stated that Deron ONLY changes the rules based on the report function. That's dishonest, please either return with evidence that I stated that or cease talking shit.
You assumed that he just doesn't like the words, that was an assumption on YOUR part.
Show me all the posts where you openly acknowledge any possibility other than that the words were banned because of people reporting them.
You said that Deron was changing the rules because a bunch of people reported things rather than because he agreed that the words should be banned and that if he said otherwise now, it would be opportunistic of him rather than honest. This is an assumption.
Add me to the sycophant club.
These are honestly some of the most lax boards I've ever been on. There have been others I've been on and am still on where people get banned for the pettiest of reasons.
My point is, shut the fuck up CIG.
It is indeed an interesting conversation, and I am always perplexed at the social aspect of people who treat the Internet different than they would in real life. Not different necessarily, than if you were with a bunch of friends in a private setting, but in general as in out in public, a workplace, at a concert with tons of people you do not know, shopping, sitting at a table in a restaurant - I just don't see you all using these words as part of your normal vocabulary in general conversation (in a public setting).
Thank God, you've arrived with this infinitely more interesting subject.The end of Return of the King gets me every fucking time!
Why would I acknowledge that possibility when Deron himself has explicitly stated that he acted as a response to reports? Utterly idiotic suggestion.